XBOX/PS2 Fixing Franchise SIm Stats

[ktd1976]

to clarify a little, sub the HB2 into the FB slot in the depth chart.....doing this i have never had a HB get over 30 carries in a game...and the HB2 gets between 5 and 15 carries....this is on PS2

[shockman]

Quote: Originally Posted by ktd1976

to clarify a little, sub the HB2 into the FB slot in the depth chart.....doing this i have never had a HB get over 30 carries in a game...and the HB2 gets between 5 and 15 carries....this is on PS2

Thanks for the clarification...What if we did that about 12 games and the other 4 games put HB #1 in the FB slot with HB #2 at the #1 spot...Wonder what the stats would look like then.

[KingV2k3]

Quote: Originally Posted by ktd1976

to clarify a little, sub the HB2 into the FB slot in the depth chart.....doing this i have never had a HB get over 30 carries in a game...and the HB2 gets between 5 and 15 carries....this is on PS2

Great info...thanks

[KingV2k3]

Quote: Originally Posted by shockman

Thanks for the clarification...What if we did that about 12 games and the other 4 games put HB #1 in the FB slot with HB #2 at the #1 spot...Wonder what the stats would look like then.

From what ktd is seeing, it might not be needed b/c the inj slider will take care of the rest...

Of course you could look at your league's rushing stats in the week 12 and do this for any team that has a back with over 300 or so carries at that point...

If you go with this fix tho, I'd do it for the first 4 weeks b/c having the backups in the starting spots could affect playoff runs for the CPU controlled teams...

Personally, I starting to gravitate tword ktd's fix, along with sitting all starters during my bye week...

The bye week thing is fast and easy...adjust depth charts, sim, adjust depth chart...done

It's more of a 'set it and forget it' thing...and I wouldn't have to do my 'drop the starter off the 3rd down back depth chart' thing, which I sometimes forget to readjust in played games...

Anyway, this is all really great stuff...thanks guys...

[Mr. JimmyFly]

Quote: Originally Posted by ktd1976

to clarify a little, sub the HB2 into the FB slot in the depth chart.....doing this i have never had a HB get over 30 carries in a game...and the HB2 gets between 5 and 15 carries....this is on PS2

Great find, thanks

[shockman]

Here is the data Im testing against this weekend. It is based off of the last 3 years. Im hitting it hard so hopefully with me Mike, and others we will get this worked out. The asterick means a record has influenced the data. If anyone can think of another stat, I will add it. Thanks

QB		TEAM OFFENSE
#OF QB'S OVER 4000 (AVG)	4	Teams over 6,000 yards offense (AVG)	3
#OF QB'S OVER 3000 (AVG) Counting 4000	15	Teams over 4,000 yards passing (AVG)	4
HIGH YARDS (AVG)	4415	Teams over 2,000 yards rushing (AVG)	9
HIGH COMPLETIONS (AVG)	374
HIGH TD'S (AVG)	37*
HIGH INT'S (AVG)	24
#OF QB'S OVER 100 RATING (AVG)	2
HIGH QB RATING (AVG)	109
ATT HIGH (AVG)	592
# OVER 500 ATT (AVG)	7
20 TD OR MORE (AVG)	12
20 INT OR MORE (AVG)	2
HIGH YDS	4717
HIGH COMPLETIONS	379
HIGH TD'S	49 *
HIGH INT'S	29
HIGH RATING	121.1
ATT HIGH	613
RB
HIGH YDS (AVG)	1797
HIGH ATT (AVG)	386
HIGH TD'S (AVG)	24 *
OVER 1600 YDS (AVG)	3
OVER 1500 YDS (AVG) Counting 1600	5
OVER 1000 YDS (AVG) Counting 1600/1500	19
OVER 10 TD'S (AVG)	9
YDS HIGH	1880
TDS HIGH	28*
ATTEMPTS HIGH	416
OVER 300 ATT (AVG)	10
WR
REC 100 OR MORE (AVG)	2
REC 90 OR MORE (AVG)	6
HIGH YDS (AVG)	1446
OVER 1300 YDS (AVG)	5
HIGH TDS (AVG)	14
10 TDS OR MORE (AVG)	7
HIGH REC	103
HIGH YDS	1563
HIGH TDS	16
SACKS
HIGH (AVG)	16
OVER 10 (AVG)	17
HIGH	16

[Mr. JimmyFly]

Did you guys see this?

SIM Stats - Coach Scheme/RB Ratio Solution, please.

It's for next gen. I couldn't get the word doc to open, so I'm not sure if it would be helpful.

[shockman]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mr. JimmyFly

Did you guys see this? SIM Stats - Coach Scheme/RB Ratio Solution, please. It's for next gen. I couldn't get the word doc to open, so I'm not sure if it would be helpful.

Yeah, its just a document with individual team settings...I dont think it will work for us.