Santonio Holmes did'nt get two feet in for the supposed game winning catch

[apexbronx]

only one Instant replay shows it, but the ESPN never shows it. Shame

[salbowski]

what has this got to do with madden? he did have 2 feet in.

someone move or lock this

[bigsmallwood]

Get your eyes checked. He clearly had both feet in bounds and possession of the ball. Lets end this thread.

[IStillDoWhatIDo]

u know. initially seeing it, I thought he got forced out. Then on the replay, I thought that he did not get his right foot down. After seeing different angles, i conceded that he got two feet down.

Either way it would not have been conclusive enough to overturn the call.

[Boilerbuzz]

Quote: Originally Posted by IStillDoWhatIDo

u know. initially seeing it, I thought he got forced out. Then on the replay, I thought that he did not get his right foot down. After seeing different angles, i conceded that he got two feet down. Either way it would not have been conclusive enough to overturn the call.

There is no force out rule anymore.
He got both feet in.
This has nothing to do with Madden.

Hope that ties up the loose ends.

[thisislegendary]

Yeah they showed the replay numerous times and he definitely was in. Isn't more of the debate on the fumble at the end anyways? I didn't even think the Holmes catch was an issue.

[IStillDoWhatIDo]

Yea, I know the rule doesn't exist anymore. I shouldn't have used that terminology. WHen they showed it from the side, I thought he got pushed out of bounds and that it wouldn't have counted.

Then it looked like his right foot sort of glided down but did not make contact with the ground.

but I wont' contribute to the unmadden post anymore

[PVarck31]

Off topic. Locked.