The Official Brandon Jacobs rating petition.

[rckinAPhilliezhat]

Quote: Originally Posted by g2thecore

Wha??? I'm confused...

I was waiting for a giants fan to blame your opinion on you being an eagles fan lol thats all

[rckinAPhilliezhat]

Quote: Originally Posted by Brandon_c993

lol you are a true eagles fan bro....but Jacobs is a great RB with great awareness, unbelievable tackle breaking ability and is actually somewhat agile especially for his size...just because he isn't the same type of back as westbrook does not mean he isn't good...everything you listed is what Westbrook excels at (except for vision good vision but not great oh and Jacobs has decent vision) ....

how does he have good vision when he just runs into everybody? lol im just sayin.

[dannydufflebags]

Quote: Originally Posted by AboveTheRim

Why are you complaining about Jacobs overall. You know nothing about football and escpically the Giants. Jacobs does not have a higher overall rating because of five other names on the Giants. Diehl, Seubert, O'Hara, Snee, Mckenzie Jacobs runs behind the best offensive line in all of the NFL. Don't worry the offensive line for the giants will have blocking ratings so Jacobs runs more like a 95 overall. I am a big Giants fan by the way.

Lol, now you are just ridiculous bro. NY Giants football consumes my life, My fiancee probably knows more about what I am talking about than half of this forum. No need to bash me people, i am just stating my feelings on the matter.

And to re hash my argument, I don't neccassarily care about the overall rating, I care that other RB's are above Jacobs when they shouldn't be.

Now if the O-line blocks like they do in real life, I wont complain. But until I see that they do, I am going to petition for a higher rating.

I just hope that McNabb's ratings take a nose dive, like his short to medium passes do.

[SouthernBrick]

They did run in a 3 back system. Not saying he wouldn't have 5 yards per carry, but your yards per carry do stay up there a bit when you got 2 other back stwiching in and out. I believe he is fine the way he is. You don't have to be a top 10 back to be a good back.

He is obviously a beast from the way some of the 8 players described him. He's ok the way he is.

[Lusion]

Quote: Originally Posted by dannydufflebags

I just hope that McNabb's ratings take a nose dive, like his short to medium passes do.

Well thats ok because westbrook is and will forever be higher the BJ. Also i read that McNabbs rating is still even higher then Eli

[83evans]

Top backs

AD
Jackson
Turner
Stewart
Parker
Westbrook
Jacobs
Lynch
Barber
Williams

[LBzrule]

As I said in the Ratings thread, stop worrying about the overall. There was no back more effective than Jacobs in the CD build. He needs to stay exactly like he is.

[dannydufflebags]

Quote: Originally Posted by Lusion

Well thats ok because westbrook is and will forever be higher the BJ. Also i read that McNabbs rating is still even higher then Eli