Home

WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

This is a discussion on WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68???? within the Madden NFL Last Gen forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Last Gen
WWE 2K22 Trailer Announcement and Breakdown
EA Sports PGA TOUR to Exclusively Have All Four Majors
Next-Gen Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1+2: Is the Upgrade Worth It?
Poll: What's more important to you, when the time comes to purchase a game? (Click to vote)
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2009, 09:02 AM   #1
Banned
 
OVR: 14
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Virginia
WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

http://www.gamespot.com/sports/blogs...n-ratings.html

WTF???????????


Wait a second - when he came to Washington he actually made ALOT of improvements from Oakland. He made plays for us and would've had another interception on his resume if during the NYG vs Washington game S. Springs did not jump in and try to INT the ball overtop of D. Hall. This I think is a bunch of BS!

And why did C. Horton get no love in the improved list? The kid won us 2 games last year (Saints and Dallas) the end of the season his stats fell off because of injuries.
Kingspadee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 04-25-2009, 09:04 AM   #2
All Star
 
OVR: 33
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

Yeah I don't agree with this one either. And TO not a top 10 receiver.

I guess its because these guys get bad press.

But Hall was pathetic man-to-man in Oakland. Like worse in the league, worse than A. Cromartie. All speed. 0 Man coverage in okaland.
Exonerated is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 09:07 AM   #3
Banned
 
OVR: 14
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Virginia
Re: WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

Yes but funny how he switched teams and volia was NOT getting burnt. Like he said Oakland's scheme did NOT fit him. But he showed up in Washington making plays...hell his first start he picked off Romo on their first drive
Kingspadee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 09:10 AM   #4
Faceuary!
 
N51_rob's Arena
 
OVR: 54
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Howard County, MD (the HoCo)
Posts: 14,832
Blog Entries: 51
Re: WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

Granted i'm a skins fan, but honestly EA is saying that 3 of the 5 worst rated players from a year ago reside in Washington? I take huge issue with that.
N51_rob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 09:13 AM   #5
Banned
 
OVR: 14
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Virginia
Re: WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

D. Thomas I DO understand. He just was not really ready but first year WRS (especially one without alot of starting experience) rarely ever do that well
Kingspadee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 04-25-2009, 09:19 AM   #6
Showtime
 
Jukeman's Arena
 
OVR: 46
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Posts: 10,980
Blog Entries: 3
Re: WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

We wanted low ratings now we got it and still not happy????

A 68 obviously wont be the same 68 n madden's past plus Hall is not even a good DB....When it comes to Man coverage he's just fast lol
Jukeman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 09:19 AM   #7
MVP
 
OVR: 26
Join Date: Sep 2008
Blog Entries: 1
Re: WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

Another upset fan.

No offense, but Hall didnt perform outstandingly well in comparison to how he was playing with the raiders. Look at it this way(although I know I wont be able to get to you) Hall with the Raiders wanted him to man cover all day long with NO pass rush. WRs would break him down and he looked extremely bad because he was trying to use his speed to keep up.

Fastforward to the Skins...The Skins have a better Defense and he was no longer called on to cover indefinitly and if a QB made a mistake he used his speed to make a play. By defense, I felt they had more QB hurries(obviously did not have many sacks) and the safety play was like day and night compared to the raiders. Sure Hall didnt get burned because he had two great safeties to watch his back.

Hall has great ball skills(hands), return ability, and speed. Thats it.

Before you go aguring about this this and this. Someone already brought it up. Look at A. Cromartie. Last year he had what 10 picks? This year he looked like a bum. Its because he lost Shawn Merriman(sp). The chargers entire defense didnt look the same without Merriman disrupting everything. Cromartie is almost a carbon copy of Hall, Great ball skills, Return ability, and speed.

A 68 is alright because he has good hands and is an very physically gifted player. 70 is basicly the new standard for an average player instead of in the 80s

Last edited by Glorious Arc; 04-25-2009 at 11:50 AM.
Glorious Arc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 09:21 AM   #8
Faceuary!
 
N51_rob's Arena
 
OVR: 54
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Howard County, MD (the HoCo)
Posts: 14,832
Blog Entries: 51
Re: WHOA! Did I read this right - D. Hall went to a 68????

But to drop Devin like that is basically calling him a busy after 1 season, and what about Fred Davis, and Malcolm Kelly? I'm no ratings expert and I doubt I could do a better job than Donny and Co, but that doesn't mean I have to like or totally agree with them. But it's all good.
N51_rob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Last Gen »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.

Top -