Rookie fixes

[ProjectSRT]

Quote: Originally Posted by 83evans

Im comparring them based on other players. Maybin is the 2nd best DE in the class. There are 2 DEs over him, doesnt add up. Wood is the 2nd best C in a great C class, hes at 71, doesnt add up. Byrd is the best cover CB in draft, 71, doesnt add up.

There is a new rating system. Everyone is lower. Like its been said, the ratings are fine.

[peteykirch]

Quote: Originally Posted by fourthreemafia

Straight line speed with no pads doesnt equal football speed with pads.

I'm still willing to bet Britt would run faster with pads than Beanie.

[Bmlives]

Pat White - 61? Too Low. Period.

[83evans]

Quote: Originally Posted by ProjectSRT

There is a new rating system. Everyone is lower. Like its been said, the ratings are fine.

Then Mack should be at 73, Brown and Orakpo at 77-78, and Jenkins at 74. Doesnt sound right does it.

[AboveTheRim]

Everyone is pretty fine with the ratings they have. The new ratings system has been brought in more to pin point key Strengths and weaknesses not to make players overall something they aren't.

[JerseySuave4]

Quote: Originally Posted by peteykirch

Kenny Britt ran faster than Beanie Wells, but yet is 3 points slower in speed.

Beanie Wells ran a 4.34 40 time at his pro day so he is actually faster than Britt on the field in pads and off the field in shorts.

[Scott]

The ratings are fine, none of these players have even played a professional down yet.

[MelMan1486]

As a Bills fan I'm fine with those ratings. The problem is some of the other rookie ratings. It seems as though the "big" name rookies are rated to high. And although Pat Whites a 61 he'll still be a force to be reckoned with with the wildcat. I would also like to know how they determine a players speed, as some people pointed out some players are slower than others when they ran a faster 40 time.