Official Madden NFL 10 Top 10 Ouarterback Ratings

[gr18]

The difficult thing when rating Romo is that he puts up very good stats....'till December.

The difficult thing about rating Eli is that he doesn't put up good stats regularly but his great play in the playoffs and Superbowl are taken under consideration now.

The thing to always remember is that the qb's weapons,or lack thereof, will make him better or worse than the rating he has.

[kcarr]

Quote: Originally Posted by mKoz26

Eli Manning is so overrated! He did nothing without Plax! I say he is nothing better than Kyle Orton. When Eli's reciever talent dipped to the Bears level, he performed like Kyle Orton. And he can't throw an accurate ball in the wind whatsoever. Tony Romo is overrated too, but I don't even want to let that debate loose.

Without plax eli had an extremely weak receiving corp. Amani isn't exactly worthy of being a number 1 receiver. He is pretty well washed up. Smith is a decent possesion type receiver but doesn't really provide a downfield threat. Dominique Hixon was starting in place of plax there and he is really not much more than a special teams player. He is definitely far from being a starting receiver.

Still, in game 5 without plax eli did complete 76 percent of his passes, throw for 267, 2 tds and no picks.

Week 12 plax was listed as getting the start but didn't have any stats. He was hurt early in the game and had no real impact. Manning went 26/33 with 3 tds and 240 yards.

Week 13 without plax he was 21/34 for 305, 1 td and 1 pick

Week 14 he struggled going 13/27 fpr 123. He did have 1 td and no picks though.

Week 15 he went 18/35 for 191 0 and 2. Another pretty week game.

Week 16 he went 17/27 for 181, 1 td and no picks. Not spectacular but they were in a position where they could win running the ball and they did so.

Week 17 he went 11/19 for 119 without a TD or a pick in a game where they were resting getting ready for the playoffs.

In 7 games with a very weak receiving corp, a receiving corp weak enough that they spent a few picks on it in this draft including their 1st round pick and they were involved in talks looking to bring in a star receiver, he completed 62.5% of his passes, averaged nearly 204 yards a game despite only playing like half of one of them, and threw 8 tds to only 3 picks. Those aren't exactly great numbers but considering his receiving corp at the time they weren't exactly terrible.

[l NErd l]

1) Rivers needs to go up 2 or 3 points. Higher passer rating!!!!
Show some love EA.
2) Brady did not even play last season, why the hell is he over Drew Brees? Brady should atleast be a 94-95 at the most.
3) Mcnabb to high. 88-89 seem fair?


I hope EA considers some of our posts......

[l NErd l]

Quote: Originally Posted by kcarr

Without plax eli had an extremely weak receiving corp. Amani isn't exactly worthy of being a number 1 receiver. He is pretty well washed up. Smith is a decent possesion type receiver but doesn't really provide a downfield threat. Dominique Hixon was starting in place of plax there and he is really not much more than a special teams player. He is definitely far from being a starting receiver. Still, in game 5 without plax eli did complete 76 percent of his passes, throw for 267, 2 tds and no picks. Week 12 plax was listed as getting the start but didn't have any stats. He was hurt early in the game and had no real impact. Manning went 26/33 with 3 tds and 240 yards. Week 13 without plax he was 21/34 for 305, 1 td and 1 pick Week 14 he struggled going 13/27 fpr 123. He did have 1 td and no picks though. Week 15 he went 18/35 for 191 0 and 2. Another pretty week game. Week 16 he went 17/27 for 181, 1 td and no picks. Not spectacular but they were in a position where they could win running the ball and they did so. Week 17 he went 11/19 for 119 without a TD or a pick in a game where they were resting getting ready for the playoffs. In 7 games with a very weak receiving corp, a receiving corp weak enough that they spent a few picks on it in this draft including their 1st round pick and they were involved in talks looking to bring in a star receiver, he completed 62.5% of his passes, averaged nearly 204 yards a game despite only playing like half of one of them, and threw 8 tds to only 3 picks. Those aren't exactly great numbers but considering his receiving corp at the time they weren't exactly terrible.

I hope this post is considered.....
His rating seems fair. I guess......

[sooners52794]

Quote: Originally Posted by Krodis

I'd say McNabb and Eli are a little high and Rivers is low if anything, to be honest. Romo and Cutler might be high too but it's hard to say.

mcnabb is at least a 94, and eli is prolly closer to 82, cutler is a bit overrated as he has some developing to do, and how in the hess is hasselbeck not in here? hes one of the most accurate and exoierenced qb's in the nfl, and has good arm strength. i think hes at least a 90

[iBlievN5]

Quote: Originally Posted by l NErd l

1) Rivers needs to go up 2 or 3 points. Higher passer rating!!!! Show some love EA. 2) Brady did not even play last season, why the hell is he over Drew Brees? Brady should atleast be a 94-95 at the most. 3) Mcnabb to high. 88-89 seem fair? I hope EA considers some of our posts......

1. Philip plays in the weakest division with some of the worst defenses in football, he had 5 games over 300 yds and all were against bottom feeder pass defenses. He has a massive amount of weapons (lt, sproles, gates, chambers, jackson, floyd, hester) that make him look better and checks down a lot on 3rd down.
2. Brady is one of the most successful QBs in the last 10 years, i have faith he'll come back as a top qb, and apparently so does ea.
3. McNabb does more with less and has better physical talents despite his "short"comings (get it? has trouble with the short throw sometimes?). he also passed for just 90 yards less than philip despite the terrible play of his WRs and being benched.

[mKoz26]

Quote: Originally Posted by kcarr

Without plax eli had an extremely weak receiving corp. Amani isn't exactly worthy of being a number 1 receiver. He is pretty well washed up. Smith is a decent possesion type receiver but doesn't really provide a downfield threat. Dominique Hixon was starting in place of plax there and he is really not much more than a special teams player. He is definitely far from being a starting receiver. Still, in game 5 without plax eli did complete 76 percent of his passes, throw for 267, 2 tds and no picks. Week 12 plax was listed as getting the start but didn't have any stats. He was hurt early in the game and had no real impact. Manning went 26/33 with 3 tds and 240 yards. Week 13 without plax he was 21/34 for 305, 1 td and 1 pick Week 14 he struggled going 13/27 fpr 123. He did have 1 td and no picks though. Week 15 he went 18/35 for 191 0 and 2. Another pretty week game. Week 16 he went 17/27 for 181, 1 td and no picks. Not spectacular but they were in a position where they could win running the ball and they did so. Week 17 he went 11/19 for 119 without a TD or a pick in a game where they were resting getting ready for the playoffs. In 7 games with a very weak receiving corp, a receiving corp weak enough that they spent a few picks on it in this draft including their 1st round pick and they were involved in talks looking to bring in a star receiver, he completed 62.5% of his passes, averaged nearly 204 yards a game despite only playing like half of one of them, and threw 8 tds to only 3 picks. Those aren't exactly great numbers but considering his receiving corp at the time they weren't exactly terrible.

Orton-like numbers. And our best reciever was Hester, who is a project player. Plus the G-men had a better line and run game.

[gjsii13]

Quote: Originally Posted by Exonerated

wow Brady 98. Did not see that coming at all. And Rivers was the best rated QB last season, better than Mcnabb Imo. But I don't agree with Brady 98. More like 96 with Brees the second best.

lol from a Colts fan

I think Brady should be a 100 (last time he played he threw 50 TDs)

Peyton should be a 97