Most Fun Game so Far.

[claystone]

I just had one of my best enjoyable games playing Madden. I decided to play my CPU vs CPU on ALL-MADDEN. See what you think of the stats.

My Skill: All-Madden
Cpu Skill: "0"
Game Speed: Slow
Speed Threshold: 50
Fatigue: 85
Playcalling: Beginner (Very Important)
AutoSub: HB (45/80)
AutoSub: Everyone else (60/80)

CPU vs CPU

OAKLAND: 29 - TEXANS: 38

TEXANS PASSING:
M. Shaub: 19 of 27 for 333yds / 2TD / 2 Int / 70% comp
(One of his passes was a 70yd TD)

OAKLAND PASSING:
J. Russell: 21 of 37 for 240yds / 1TD / 3 Int / 56% comp
__________________________________________________ ____
TEXANS RUSHING:
S. Slaton: 24 for 107yds / 2TD / 4.4 avg
M. Shaub: 3 for 1yds / 0TD / 0.3

OAKLAND RUSHING:
J. Fargas: 21 for 75yds / 1TD / 3.5 avg.
M. Bush: 9 for 49yds / 1TD / 5.4 avg.
O. O'Neil 2 for 4yds / 0TD / 2.0
__________________________________________________ ____
TEXANS DEFENSE:
Sacks: 2
INT: 3

OAKLAND DEFENSE:
Sacks: 3
INT: 2

NOTES: I was very impressed with the game play and game play logic so far. Stats seem in line. I'll play more.

Just fix the injuries in cpu vs cpu game plus IR & Penalties and i'll be fine.

[spdawesome]

Just played a CPU vs. CPU game using these settings (8min; Acc. Clock; 15 sec. r.o.)

Overall the scores pretty solid; nothing to out of hand; pretty realistic, I'd say. RBs seem to be getting a generally realistic amount of carries. QBs seem to be throwing for a, again, a generally good amount of attempts.

The only issues seem to be with QB completion percentage and INTs thrown. It happened a few more times than desired, where a QB's completion percentage was below 50% --- although, not a huge issue. Also, there seems to be a lack of INTs thrown, as well. Still, this is better than too many INTs, of course.

I've yet to use these settings for human play, yet. But, I plan on it.