franchise mode issue...

[RavensFan2k3]

Quote: Originally Posted by driftwood

so the only way i can get my players attributes to boost substantially like the teams with good coaches is to somehow get those good coaches on my staff? there is no possible way my coaches can garner any better ratings to justify giving my players boosts in attribute points like other good coaches no matter how well i do throughout a franchise? will i have to wait till next years game & hope that my favorite teams coaches get considered a better rating based on there performance of the real 2009 season (& at this point its all hope & speculation since the season isn't done yet)? is this what it has come too? do you now understand why i think its broken?

i understand what you're saying...i thought the coahces had ratings and they progress aswell?

[JayD]

This has to be due to coaching.

[driftwood]

Quote: Originally Posted by RavensFan2k3

i understand what you're saying...i thought the coahces had ratings and they progress aswell?

they actually do... my coach is 100 overall (most likely has something to do with all the winning i have done)... but unfortunately nothing has changed when it comes to the extra attribute bonus that my players receive during the off season...

those attribute boosts, only seem to be correlated to a spacific coach... coaches who never had them to begin with are SOL...

thats my argument i'm trying to make

[driftwood]

Quote: Originally Posted by JayD

This has to be due to coaching.

we have come to that conclusion... see above post...

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by driftwood

so the only way i can get my players attributes to boost substantially like the teams with good coaches is to somehow get those good coaches on my staff? there is no possible way my coaches can garner any better ratings to justify giving my players boosts in attribute points like other good coaches no matter how well i do throughout a franchise? will i have to wait till next years game & hope that my favorite teams coaches get considered a better rating based on there performance of the real 2009 season (& at this point its all hope & speculation since the season isn't done yet)? is this what it has come too? do you now understand why i think its broken?

I understand why you think it's broken. It's not working the way you want it to.

Doesn't make it broken, but if you want to continue to argue about it, feel free.

[driftwood]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

I understand why you think it's broken. It's not working the way you want it to. Doesn't make it broken, but if you want to continue to argue about it, feel free.

i get it... you cant comprehend what i'm trying to say...

doesn't look like your alone

[KANE699]

Quote: Originally Posted by driftwood

they are rushing for those kinda yards b/c i am controlling them & playing games... if i were simulating i would be lucky to even have a single 1000 yard rusher... which i guess could be another issue with simulated stats, but i'm not complaining about that

Even if they are rated much higher like you are wanting simming the games wont produce anything close to the stats you are getting from playing the games anyways because you are putting up unrealistically huge numbers.

[driftwood]

Quote: Originally Posted by KANE699

Even if they are rated much higher like you are wanting simming the games wont produce anything close to the stats you are getting from playing the games anyways because you are putting up unrealistically huge numbers.

now that i've figured out player production doesn't have much to do with coaches ratings... i have since then stopped using that as an argument, but thanks for restating that!