|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by billsmetalbooze |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catch seems more important, way more, than CIT. and even a guy with 12 Catch could come down with some balls from a scrub QB when he's open. not always, but sometimes.
so, i THINK, but i'm not certain, that the WR needs to catch it first (catch rating) and if a defender is going for it too, then the CIT comes into effect.
but having a guy with a 12 Catch rating still hold onto balls in the wide open (no defender) makes me not totally certain.
the only lesson: a guy with 99 Catch and 12 CIT does way better, way, than a guy with 12 Catch and 99 CIT.
Catch means more.
unscientific experiment done. i'll play my franchise with my 96 CIT guy. but he does have an 85 catch and he's 6'5" so i'll treat him like a mid 1st rounder. i'll give up Lee Evans and next years 1st plus this year's 3rd and 4th (used my second and first, again with me giving more than i have to, to take a 85 DE who was a sleeper, trying to be somewhat realistic taking two dominant players in one draft and having the 32nd pick)...
if anyone is still reading, take WRs with hight Catch. CIT doesn't mean as much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That makes sense - or perhaps the CIT rating somehow modifies the CTH rating in that situation. Your tests don't make it seem like a separate rating in that the 99 CTH guy drops everything while the 12 CTH guy catches everything in CIT situations.
Could be some kind of weighted average (the effective CTH rating in CIT situations is 80% of CTH + 20% of CIT).
Wouldn't be surprised if there's some kind of "difficulty factor" or something to try to simulate that better QBs put the ball in more catchable locations (might explain why the difference was smaller with Peyton throwing vs Joe Average QB).