Team Ratings posted

[soxboy7]

http://www.maddennation.com/madden2004/ratings/

[Brandwin]

Saw that eariler before I left...I like that most teams are close. I think only team rated under a 80 overall is the cards most teams are pretty evenly matched, pretty much like the NFL, wide open.

[Jabisco]

Thanks

[GeePee20]

I think they gave a bit too much love to the Bengals.

[JohnDoe8865]

Wow, they crapped on the Panthers Defense. I saw the 49ers defense rated higher at 85 than Carolina at 84 when they had arguably the second best defense in the NFL behind Tampa Bay, and no worse than 4th best in the league. Carolina should have been rated lower on Offense, maybe a 79 and atleast a 87 on defense.

[elperro]

Quote:

---

GeePee20 said:
I think they gave a bit too much love to the Bengals.

---

I wouldn’t say that. Even though I may be a bit biased, over the last few years the Bengals have had decent teams on paper (but games aren’t played paper so they end up losing 10 games a year ). They have made some nice free agent picks up this off season and had a good draft. I don’t think they will have a wining record this year but they won’t lose 10+ games either.

[GeePee20]

Quote:

---

elperro said:

Quote:

---

GeePee20 said:
I think they gave a bit too much love to the Bengals.

---

I wouldn’t say that. Even though I may be a bit biased, over the last few years the Bengals have had decent teams on paper (but games aren’t played paper so they end up losing 10 games a year ). They have made some nice free agent picks up this off season and had a good draft. I don’t think they will have a wining record this year but they won’t lose 10+ games either.

---

But 81 overall? They were 2-14 . They rated them higher than the Browns who made the playoffs.

[elperro]

I don't know what to say to that. Maybe they are showing Marvin lots of love?