Josh Freeman

[brettmickey]

Quote: Originally Posted by FlyEaglesFly3

Vick didn't get worn down lol. Look at the teams he faced at the beginning vs the end. It was a mixture of bad play calling, bad OL, and injuries. Vick didn't wear down or decline, his team did.

Well yeah that was what I was trying to imply. The OL allowed Vick to get hit a lot + Vick running the ball and getting hit= injuries and injuries= wear and tear on the body. Vick didn't look the same in the last 2-3 games last season not because his ability to play declined, his body needed a rest. At least that's what it looked like...

[FlyEaglesFly3]

Quote: Originally Posted by Xxraiders702xX

freemen is a 90

No he's not.

Spell it right.

[bigbob]

Quote:

That's cool...it is what it is...thanks for being the most informed NFL fan of all time...knowledgeable to all teams...except "Da Bears"...I've given my rating of Josh Freeman (86-87) and Timmy Tebow (70-79) which by the way how did Tebow even become a person of interest in another players self titled thread...oh well...like i said 86-87 for Free and 70-79 for Timmy...

Please show me where I said I was the most knowledgable fan? I stated that I watch every team so I'm not going to sit here and pretend like "duh, Freeman is the greatest". I watched him play week in and week out.. it's my job to watch the games every week. So while you sit there with your rose colored glasses, people that actually have non-biased opinions are going to continue to prove people wrong in this thread.

Quote: Originally Posted by FlyEaglesFly3

No he's not. Spell it right.

Well, Michael Vick is a free man.. so maybe that's what he was implying?

[btemp]

Quote: Originally Posted by Automatik

I'd give Tebow 77 and Freeman 86.

Yep I don't see how you could rate Tebow any higher, or Freeman any lower.

[angels eclipse7]

I'd give Freeman an 84 and Tebow a 73.

[Broncos86]

I'd give Tebow a 75 - 76. He ended the year around there, and he didn't do anything to hurt his chances. He was tossed into a situation where he had no running game and no help from a defense. Everyone was gunning for him, and he did well for a rookie who rode the pine all year and was suddenly tossed into the starting role.

[seriousluboy83]

Quote: Originally Posted by bigbob

Please show me where I said I was the most knowledgable fan? I stated that I watch every team so I'm not going to sit here and pretend like "duh, Freeman is the greatest". I watched him play week in and week out.. it's my job to watch the games every week. So while you sit there with your rose colored glasses, people that actually have non-biased opinions are going to continue to prove people wrong in this thread. Well, Michael Vick is a free man.. so maybe that's what he was implying?

So because I rate Freeman as a 86-87 I'm biased...really??? At the end of last season Freeman was already rated 86...but by my understanding you want him as a 82...so my question to you is on what grounds does Freeman deserve a ratings drop???

[bigbob]

Quote: Originally Posted by seriousluboy83

So because I rate Freeman as a 86-87 I'm biased...really??? At the end of last season Freeman was already rated 86...but by my understanding you want him as a 82...so my question to you is on what grounds does Freeman deserve a ratings drop???

I'm talking about the people who say he should be rated above 90.