Best Team To Replace In Franchise?

[Shroom]

Umm is it really even a question? Obviously the Broncos are the worst, most horrendous team to ever step onto a football field.

[Amino]

The Browns. Basically the whole state of Ohio.

[andas3]

I usually replace the team with the worst record the year before, and then for a fantasy created team put the top players of that team on it





Patriots 11'

[Manning2Harrison]

Jacksonville. Never should have gotten a franchise.

[PuddleMonkey]

time out... if I create a team can I use it in a new franchise mode?

[RaiderKtulu]

Usually I'd just replace the Raiders because I don't want to play against my favorite team.

From a more neutral perspective, I think Buffalo, Jacksonville or Minnesota make the most sense as they seem to be the most likely to move and thus possibly get renamed. After that would be the Browns or Texans. The Texans are the newest and thus least "established" team, and the Browns (depending on how you feel about franchises moving) shouldn't even exist.

[Manning2Harrison]

Quote: Originally Posted by PuddleMonkey

time out... if I create a team can I use it in a new franchise mode?

Yes. But the players on the team you replace will disappear. What I like to do when i use a created team is release all of the players, or the ones that matter, anyway, and replace them with the lowest-rated FA's. It would be sad to replace the Jags and have a guy like MJD just disappear.

[X12Celtics3]

Jacksonville. Bad team, little history (unlike the Bills and Vikes), the worst uniforms in the league (if that matters to you).