|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by huskerwr38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think you missed his point completely here. KBLover is simply saying that as the technology progresses, our expectations increase. It shouldn't be that much to ask for a football game to accurately represent the NFL. If amateur programmers, like him, can do some pretty cool stuff then pro programmers should be able to do pretty amazing things given the tools and time they have. I don't know what PSA's and kids not playing outside had to do with that post?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PSA comment was aimed at people who actually know what it's like to WANT to play outside - AKA dudes in their upper 30's. Merely offered as a societal commentary about how times have changed.
There has never been an accurate reflection of the NFL... we shouldn't act like it's been done before because it hasn't. Whether you look at PS2 Madden or some other game as the example - same concerns.
If we look at FBPro, our personal opinion might say the game was great. But if you looked at the message boards, they looked exactly like these. Some helpful people pushing the game to improve, others helping players deal with the status quo, and rif-raff that seek to derail other's enjoyment because theirs wasn't up to par (and various mixes of the three).
Essentially, amateur programmers and their limited experience shouldn't not be indicative of professional programmers... Especially when it comes to satisfaction.
IMO, you get out what you put in. I enjoy this game because I know what it took for me to develop into a competitive player - and I enjoy the preparation as much as the battle. If someone neither likes the preparation nor the battle, we aren't going to enjoy the same game played in the same arena. Likewise, a game that caters to players like myself won't agree with them and a game that caters to players like them will not agree with me.
Show me a programmer with 5 million satisfied consumers and I'll show you a professional programmer. LOL
Later