Rate this player:

[macbranson]

Cornerback puts up 67 combined tackles, 4.5 sacks, 5 INTs and 2 forced fumbles last season. What do you think he should be rated? This is a Nickel corner, by the way.

[MarshawnLynch]

Quote: Originally Posted by macbranson

Cornerback puts up 67 combined tackles, 4.5 sacks, 5 INTs and 2 forced fumbles last season. What do you think he should be rated? This is a Nickel corner, by the way.

low 80s to mid 80s so says maybe 84-86ish?? is this some thing u got to complain about?? haha

[KBLover]

Quote: Originally Posted by macbranson

Cornerback puts up 67 combined tackles, 4.5 sacks, 5 INTs and 2 forced fumbles last season. What do you think he should be rated? This is a Nickel corner, by the way.

Maybe something like:

SPD 93
AGI 92
ACC 90
AWR 75
TAK 75
POW 85
MCV 88
ZCV 85
CTH 73


Based on how my DBs play in my franchise and the type of DBs I try to go after and playing a no-switch game on defense.

[macbranson]

I'm asking because he's my nickel corner, but he had better stats than my other corners. Given, he is in a better position to make tackles against the run and get sacks because of where he is on the field. But he looked like he was headed to the Pro Bowl, but then some other guys beat him out. And he's only an 80 overall and I thought he should be rated higher after that season he had. I'm thinking about increasing his Awareness, Tackling and Hit Power.

[funnyfiggy]

Why would he increase? If he can get those stats, then that is exactly how good he is. He is no better or worse than an 80 overall.

[at23steelers]

CB's need to be rated more than just those. If he allowed 30 passes to be completed on him in 34 attempts, with 5 TD's against him and a QB passer rating of 130 than he would be horrible.

[TheNumber35]

Quote: Originally Posted by at23steelers

CB's need to be rated more than just those. If he allowed 30 passes to be completed on him in 34 attempts, with 5 TD's against him and a QB passer rating of 130 than he would be horrible.

If he did all you described...he'd be Antonio Cromartie

[at23steelers]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheNumber35

If he did all you described...he'd be Antonio Cromartie

Exactly Hall or Cromartie. Or, he could maybe be Revis, with only 20 passes thrown his way, and 6 completed. Who's to know based on those generic stats? Can't separate mediocre talent with great talent. Not sure I understand based on him having sacks and INT's to rate his speed and man coverage and zone coverage would be even tougher.