|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by jmik58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very good tip. I don't think anyone has mentioned that. I think the one thing that might hold me back is that I know in real life players get signing bonuses and when players get cut there is that risk. I also know that is how the other teams are doing contracts and how they are affected when they cut someone.
Basically I'm saying that I love your strategy, but it leans a little towards the arcade side so it might not be for everyone. I almost feel like it gives an unfair advantage, although it doesn't guarantee anything because you can sign everyone you want (as I've found). Bottom line though is that I'll probably still try this Great addition to the thread!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I try not to abuse it. I mean I wont use that on a 25 y/o Julio Jones if I see him on FA or something.
However, if I see a 37 y/o Champ Bailey on there at 87 overall, and he wants 6 mil for 3 years with 3 mil signing bonus each season, thats when I will use it. When Vets in the real world get signed to big deal at that age, for the most part they take some of the risk too, to get that big deal. In most cases those risky deal with aging Vets dont have tons of guaranteed money, but instead have small bonuses that are loaded with incentives that will get he Vet paid as long as they play well. Think the Donovan McNabb contract with the Redskins. He got his big deal, but it was upon him to perform. The Skins set it up so if he didnt perform, they could cut him with very little penalty since it wasnt set up with that huge bonus money.
Back to Champ, at his age, even in the NFL now, he would have to take some of the risk himself to get that big deal based on his performance. So in the game instead of giving him a 3 year 18 million dollar deal at 37 years old with a 3 million dollar bonus each season, I'll give him the same 3 y/18m dollar deal with a 1 million dollar bonus each season, or zero, etc.
That way, if he comes in and performs well and keeps his 87 rating, I'll in turn keep him for another year and he gets his full 6 million. However, lets say he comes and and has lost a step and doesnt achieve his goals and falls to an 83 overall. Well then I will cut him since he doesnt deserve his 6 mil a year for the next year. He didn't hold up his end and hit his bonuses (or goal in the game) so why should I be punished for 'giving the old guy a chance'.