|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Gorilla Glass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. That's why awareness of all 10 men should play into the QBs (me) decision making.
The cone was originally an illustration tool used by ESPN. They guessed what the QB saw and guessed why. There is a chance that all QBs see the samething, but just lack confidence to make certain throws. That shouldn't impede on me while I'm at the helm.
The cone was not needed because all of us see the TV screen differently. I can anticipate a play based on years of experience playing Madden. I have my own cone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure you get what I'm saying.
I think that user and player awareness should be 2 separate entities that come into play simultaneously.
Ex. User awareness is reading defenses, knowing where and when to throw, knowing if your qb is capable of making those throws.
This ties into player ratings by making you use a smaller vision cone for a qb with less awareness. You can still try to make any throw you want but it may be harder. However having good user awareness that I mentioned earlier still makes it easy and possible.
I think the god mode camera view is another reason the cone was needed. No qb not even Peyton and Brady can see every receiver on the field at the same time like we the user can from the god view.
All that being said i respect your opinion of the cone lol.