NCAA Draft Class results/conversion

[BigshotSportcenter]

Quote: Originally Posted by Robcards

What scheme? Switch DE and HB to 'balanced' and see what their OVR are. By the way, after importing my own class and being able to actually look at the ratings, CBs are extremely overpowered everyone is 77+, so something has to be done about that. I have a lot of work to do on my classes.

It was a 4-3 base scheme and balance offense.

[BigMacAttack22]

Question from someone maybe starting online CFM using imports: do you think the quality is pretty good for an online league? Does it make things unbalanced at all?

[Robcards]

Quote: Originally Posted by BigshotSportcenter

It was a 4-3 base scheme and balance offense.

There are position specific ones. I.e. Thomas may be 87 if your scheme is speed rb but only be 78 ovr for balanced

[tpytell]

Does any one have rookies with long hair, noticed going around no dreads for clowney/watkins

[wildcatchild]

Can you edit player names, heigths, weights, attributes, etc. in franchise mode? If so, I'm not as concerned about the random draft classes.

[LousyJackRanga]

Can we edit stats of drafted players?

[Robcards]

Quote: Originally Posted by BigMacAttack22

Question from someone maybe starting online CFM using imports: do you think the quality is pretty good for an online league? Does it make things unbalanced at all?

Depends on if you used a tuned class or not. I'm currently working on generating balanced classes. The out of the box NCAA rosters generate classes that are far too powerful, particularly for some positions like QB.

[juice]

It may be too early to ask this question and it might not ever have an answer, but are imported draft classes rated based on the existing roster. By that I mean, do rookies get rated based on similar players at their position that are already in the game, or is it a set scale (for example, A overall guys are rated 85-95)?

I ask because those of us that are rerating rosters based on FBGratings will have significantly lower overalls for our players than the stock ratings. So while a top rated veteran in the game may only be rated in the 80's, we might have rookies coming in and becoming high 90's in their first couple of years.

Maybe this doesn't matter because overall rating isn't necessarily an indicator of skill at a position. Just thinking out loud here.