Playbook with Good 3WR+ sets + Read Option?

[Madwolf]

I run with the Panthers, and I absolutely hate their play book. The option stuff is okay, but there is so much of it I just feel gimmicky, and the lack of 3+ WR sets is murdering my offense.

Does anyone know of a playbook with a good mix of 3+ WR sets, and still does the read option and I-Form type stuff?

[ruttentud]

Have you checked out Seahawks?

[Madwolf]

Quote: Originally Posted by ruttentud

Have you checked out Seahawks?

I mean too before my last game, but I forgot. I think it's what I'm going to try.

Lost my first game in like 4 seasons in Franchise (against humans) tonight. I didn't have Steve Smith (hurt), or Brandon LaFell (hurt), so my WRs were crap, but I felt like the plays lacked explosiveness when I got down. I mean, Greg Olsen is great, but you're not going to complete a ton of long passes to Greg Olsen getting blitzed either you know? Then the other plays sub in ANOTHER TE in the 4 wide, and I couldn't replace the TE with a WR via subbing or the packages. I was very frustrated.

I actually lost in OT, which I was okay with, given my WR situation, and Carolina's awful secondary. We had the most up to date Franchise rosters, but of course EA can't be bothered to update those so I don't have Quinten Mikell either.

[kevlar_pso]

You should give the Redskins playbook a chance. It has what you are looking for.

[sirkicley]

Quote: Originally Posted by Madwolf

Does anyone know of a playbook with a good mix of 3+ WR sets, and still does the read option and I-Form type stuff?

Try the Skins as someone suggested.


But definitely check out the Eagles.

[IlluminatusUIUC]

Buffalo's has a lot of that.

[Madwolf]

I looked at them all and I really like Buffalo's. It had a really great mix of plays and is less focused on getting your WRs purely vertical so much.

[LordHorc]

I love the bears playbook - it has plenty of 3+ WR sets and one of them, Bears Dig, is nearly unstoppable if you throw to A as he cuts. The bears playbook also has a good amount of I formation, but sadly is lacking an option section, otherwise itd be the best playbook