I hear they're fantastic. And this is not meant as a dig at Mr Knight's efforts over the years.
But I am using the SCEA Spring Training Rosters from Sony. I.E. The default rosters that come with the game.
My question is.. Beyond the fact that Knight's Minor League Rosters have players with their actual names completed all the way through AA and AAA, Yeah, He has Bryce Harper..
What else does OSFM bring to the table?
If you're looking at ratings and potentials, arent these just a matter of subjective opinion? And as we approach August, can we now go back and look at OSFM's projected performances and determine definitively whether the OSFM rosters were any more accurate than the SCEA?
And so far as Potential is concerned, what guarantee is there that OSFM's Player A will necessarily perform at the projected level any more than SCEA?
My point being... If I have my SCEA pitcher John Doe with XYZ ratings, and OFSM has the same pitcher John Doe with ABC ratings, is there some proof that the real life John Doe will perform closer to ABC than XYZ?
Or is it all just a matter of window dressing being able to have Bryce Harper?
I'm not digging at Mr Knight. I almost consider him a God.
I'm just asking in real terms what the difference is between SCEA and OSFM.

Comment