Can Someone Explain This To Me?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marshmont
    Rookie
    • Jul 2011
    • 15

    #1

    Can Someone Explain This To Me?

    I don't know all the rules to baseball so maybe I'm wrong here but how is it that Josh Beckett gets a loss in a 7-4 ballgame when he only gave up 3 runs? This isn't the first time I've seen this with this game. Beckett pitched 7 innings giving up 3 runs. Bard came in and gave up a couple of runs. I was down 7-2 going into the 9th but Ortiz crushed a homer to make it 7-4. I still lost but how does Beckett get the loss?
  • Kelvarr
    Pro
    • Feb 2003
    • 760

    #2
    Re: Can Someone Explain This To Me?

    It is because Beckett gave up the lead (Losing 3-0 or 3-2 or whatever). That relinquished lead was never reclaimed, therefore, Beckett gets the loss no matter how many runs he gave up.

    Now....if Beckett had given up 3 runs, then you took a 4 run lead, then Bard came in and let the score get to 7-4, well, then Bard would get the loss.

    Basically it boils down to the fact that Beckett gave up the lead, and the lead was never taken back.
    Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a ttoal jmulbe and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

    amzanig huh?

    Comment

    • marshmont
      Rookie
      • Jul 2011
      • 15

      #3
      Re: Can Someone Explain This To Me?

      Originally posted by Kelvarr
      It is because Beckett gave up the lead (Losing 3-0 or 3-2 or whatever). That relinquished lead was never reclaimed, therefore, Beckett gets the loss no matter how many runs he gave up.

      Now....if Beckett had given up 3 runs, then you took a 4 run lead, then Bard came in and let the score get to 7-4, well, then Bard would get the loss.

      Basically it boils down to the fact that Beckett gave up the lead, and the lead was never taken back.
      Ok. I guess that makes sense. I never understood that but I have to live with it. Thanks for explaining that to me.

      Comment

      Working...