Recommended Videos

Collapse

Sleepers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • grgmths1433
    MVP
    • Apr 2007
    • 1936

    #1

    Sleepers

    Who are your sleeper teams in 14... My pick is the Royals! They have the right pieces to make an run.
    PSN: Dreamchaser_865

    MLB- Milwaukee Brewers
    NFL- Green Bay Packers
    NBA- Milwaukee Bucks
  • smiley3
    Pro
    • Jan 2012
    • 730

    #2
    Re: Sleepers

    I would say the white sox can clinch a wild card

    Comment

    • dbacks_Nation
      Pro
      • Jan 2012
      • 705

      #3
      Re: Sleepers

      San Diego Padres
      MLB The Show 21 Stadium Creator
      PSN ID: gcngamer128

      MLB NL: Arizona Diamondbacks
      MLB AL: Kansas City Royals
      NHL: Vegas Golden Knights

      Twitter: codedandunited
      Instagram: codedandunited

      Comment

      • grgmths1433
        MVP
        • Apr 2007
        • 1936

        #4
        Re: Sleepers

        Would the Indians classified as a sleeper?

        Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
        PSN: Dreamchaser_865

        MLB- Milwaukee Brewers
        NFL- Green Bay Packers
        NBA- Milwaukee Bucks

        Comment

        • Ghost Of The Year
          MetsJetsKnicks.
          • Mar 2014
          • 6498

          #5
          Re: Sleepers

          The Yankees. But not for the team they have now but because of the team they can reassemble as the season progresses. Cash is King. I'd also be interested in seeing what one could get for this unknown minor league prospect Alex Rodriguez they have.
          T-Bone.

          Comment

          • CaseIH
            MVP
            • Sep 2013
            • 3945

            #6
            Re: Sleepers

            Originally posted by grgmths1433
            Who are your sleeper teams in 14... My pick is the Royals! They have the right pieces to make an run.
            I like the Royals chances too this year. I could actually see the White Sox being a sleeper team.

            Also if you consider Seattle a sleeper cause most analyst didnt think Cano would add enough to get them to the postseason. I could see Seattle making a run at the West this year.

            I dont think there is any real what you would call sleeper teams in the NL, but if I had to pick 1 it might the Brewers unfortunately.
            Everyone who exalts themselves will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted- Luke14-11

            Favorite teams:
            MLB- Reds/ and whoever is playing the Cubs
            NBA- Pacers
            NFL- Dolphins & Colts

            Comment

            • grgmths1433
              MVP
              • Apr 2007
              • 1936

              #7
              Re: Sleepers

              Originally posted by CaseIH
              I like the Royals chances too this year. I could actually see the White Sox being a sleeper team.

              Also if you consider Seattle a sleeper cause most analyst didnt think Cano would add enough to get them to the postseason. I could see Seattle making a run at the West this year.

              I dont think there is any real what you would call sleeper teams in the NL, but if I had to pick 1 it might the Brewers unfortunately.
              Why you say unfortunately the Brew Crew? Because of your Reds. The Reds and Brewers will be fighting for third in the division.

              Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
              PSN: Dreamchaser_865

              MLB- Milwaukee Brewers
              NFL- Green Bay Packers
              NBA- Milwaukee Bucks

              Comment

              • grgmths1433
                MVP
                • Apr 2007
                • 1936

                #8
                Re: Sleepers

                Would you consider the White Sox be a rebuilding team. Or a sleeper?
                PSN: Dreamchaser_865

                MLB- Milwaukee Brewers
                NFL- Green Bay Packers
                NBA- Milwaukee Bucks

                Comment

                • Babrook
                  Rookie
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 37

                  #9
                  Re: Sleepers

                  Originally posted by grgmths1433
                  Would the Indians classified as a sleeper?

                  Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
                  92 wins last year, but no one seems to respect them at all, so I'd say sure. But they shouldn't be.

                  Comment

                  • grgmths1433
                    MVP
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 1936

                    #10
                    Re: Sleepers

                    Originally posted by Babrook
                    92 wins last year, but no one seems to respect them at all, so I'd say sure. But they shouldn't be.
                    I think they will be 5 more games better than last year.
                    PSN: Dreamchaser_865

                    MLB- Milwaukee Brewers
                    NFL- Green Bay Packers
                    NBA- Milwaukee Bucks

                    Comment

                    • Babrook
                      Rookie
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 37

                      #11
                      Re: Sleepers

                      Originally posted by grgmths1433
                      I think they will be 5 more games better than last year.
                      Wow, that is quite optimistic.

                      They're an improved team offensively almost by default - Bourn and Cabrera both had down years, and Drew Stubbs isn't there anymore and David Murphy is almost certainly an upgrade there. Question is gonna be the pitching - the loss of Jimenez and Kazmir is gonna hurt, but a full year of Salazar should offset that a bit. Trevor Bauer's performance yesterday was really encouraging but he is still on the outside looking in for the rotation.

                      Anyway, people that aren't giving the Indians credit are going to be surprised when they're an high 80's-low 90's win team again this year.

                      Comment

                      • grgmths1433
                        MVP
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 1936

                        #12
                        Re: Sleepers

                        Originally posted by Babrook
                        Wow, that is quite optimistic.

                        They're an improved team offensively almost by default - Bourn and Cabrera both had down years, and Drew Stubbs isn't there anymore and David Murphy is almost certainly an upgrade there. Question is gonna be the pitching - the loss of Jimenez and Kazmir is gonna hurt, but a full year of Salazar should offset that a bit. Trevor Bauer's performance yesterday was really encouraging but he is still on the outside looking in for the rotation.

                        Anyway, people that aren't giving the Indians credit are going to be surprised when they're an high 80's-low 90's win team again this year.
                        Oh I not speaking low about the Tribe. They always been a quite that making noise and never get the attention they deserve. Yea I agree the pitching has to hold up to be were they was last year. Yan Gomes is gonna surprise a lot of people this year. With Santana at 3rd that's gonna be interesting to follow. I like playing with underdog teams but I don't think the Tribe qualifies as a underdog. Teams like Astros, Cubs, Twins, Padres, Brewers, White Sox comes to mind.
                        PSN: Dreamchaser_865

                        MLB- Milwaukee Brewers
                        NFL- Green Bay Packers
                        NBA- Milwaukee Bucks

                        Comment

                        Working...