|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Regent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I decided yesterday to trade in 17 while I can still get a decent amount on it to put towards Madden or NBA.
When 17 first came out, for all of its early problems, I was still having a blast playing franchise and RTTS. The recent patches just sucked the enjoyment out of it for me, and I went from playing every day, to maybe once a week.
With 16, I played it right up until 17 released and enjoyed every session. After packing up 17 last night I fired up 16 again and ended up playing way too late, because it was FUN again.
I'm starting to think that, as a strictly offline player, I should start waiting a year, until all the patching is done, before I buy any sports title, then decide. Up until now, I've been a day one guy, but it might be worthwhile to wait it out. If nothing else, it'd be cheaper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I echo your sentiment. Not just for the show but all sports games. I don't like how patches can now dramatically change gameplay in a way that we need to recalibrate each time a patch is released. It never really allows me to settle in. Patches use to focus primarily on glitches not fundamentally change the way a game plays. I posted in another thread how this game has changed since release. For me, not in a positive way. Subjective of course but I loved the feel of hitting at release. Now it feels the same as past iterations. Not necessarily a bad thing but just stale vs. the feel of 17 at release. Personal preference. I wish us offliners were allowed to choose which "patch" version we want to play with. Similar to how NHL allows you to choose the tuner version of your liking.
Sent from my iPad using
Operation Sports