You're looking for response time, not refresh rate. As mentioned earlier in the thread the show is capped at 60 fps (fyi fps = hrz).
The 1 ms refers to pixel response, which is more what you're interested in, but even then it's a bit misleading. Pixel response is only one in a whole slew of factors that make up response time, and most of those posted numbers (like 1 ms) refer to grey-to-grey pixel response times, which is the easiest thing for monitors to do. It's entirely possible for a monitor with a 2 or 4 ms gtg to be faster with colours than a 1 ms monitor. There is a lot of misinformation going around.
I could get really in depth here, there is a lot to unpack here, but I'll make it short and sweet.
The G7 is a good monitor, and you're going to get a great response time out of it. Most MODERN (2018+) TVs are pretty competitive when it comes to response times and other things gamers care about. I'd recommend anything with the Samsung brand, though a word of warning: Samsung may be industry leading hardware, but you usually have to spend a lot of time hunting through convoluted menus in order to make it look and play it's best.
Samsung has terrible firmware (the pre-installed software) and a bad habit of having some of the worst out of box settings possible. True for both their TVs and monitors. Trust me I have both. Hardware = A+. Firmware = D after firmware updates, F before.
If you need this for both the PlayStation and a PC (even a thearetical future one), get the monitor. If it's just for the PlayStation, get a tv.
Sent from my Pixel 3 using
Operation Sports mobile app