All-Time Dimers collection

[BelgianHammer]

Quote: Originally Posted by jbandy10

Is it just me, or does Gary Payton seem WAY more usable stats wise than Magic?

No, it's not just you. Defensively he seems like a machine.

[Phanatic21]

I don't think its fair to rate someone over a 954 who didn't win anything. Like you said, he was a one-dimensional player who couldn't carry a team past the first round.

With that being said, Nash was one cheap shot away (arguably) from playing in (and probably winning) the 2007 NBA finals.

[jyoung]

Does anyone have Sapphire John Stockton yet?

I'd love to see what his ratings and badges are. Gold Stockton is a pretty good card already, but he's a bit too slow to keep up with the PGs that most people use online.

[andylauo]

The rewards did not pop up when i finish the collection why?
who else has the same thing?

[Scramz718]

Quote: Originally Posted by vc15

I believe he's only rated at a 92 so he won't be super rare like your Onyx Kobes or LeBrons.

Quote: Originally Posted by synistr

92 seems almost criminal. Is this the Rockets version or the Magic? I think he should be 96 or 97. isnt onyx Nash 97? TMac was unstoppable in his prime and should have decent passing ratings. Not a great defender but better than Nash.

The been adjusting the ONXY's ratings. Kobe was a 94, D12 92, and Nash a 92 on that unlocked roster, but they all got boosted when the where release. I expect TMAC to be at least a 95. It's the Magics ones.


XB1

[suh0208]

Quote: Originally Posted by jyoung

Does anyone have Sapphire John Stockton yet? I'd love to see what his ratings and badges are. Gold Stockton is a pretty good card already, but he's a bit too slow to keep up with the PGs that most people use online.

I have that Sapphire John, he's rated 93 overall, with 95 speed.

[Scramz718]

Quote: Originally Posted by jbandy10

Is it just me, or does Gary Payton seem WAY more usable stats wise than Magic?

Magic's combination of size and speed alone makes him a better option. Rating wise GP is the better shooter for sure. GP defensive ratings are maxed. Defensively Magic is also a beast. Plus he can guard just about any player in the game. GP can lockdown PGs and some SGs. You'll have a better chance at guarding some of the cheesiest player like KD, LBJ, Melo etc with Magic. Magic is defiantly more useable stat wise than GP.


XB1

[jbandy10]

Quote: Originally Posted by Scramz718

Magic's combination of size and speed alone makes him a better option. Rating wise GP is the better shooter for sure. GP defensive ratings are maxed. Defensively Magic is also a beast. Plus he can guard just about any player in the game. GP can lockdown PGs and some SGs. You'll have a better chance at guarding some of the cheesiest player like KD, LBJ, Melo etc with Magic. Magic is defiantly more useable stat wise than GP. XB1

GP has a 99 steal, a better 3 point shot, better speed, and better defensive stats.

I think I'll take that over Magic's superior rebounding and size. (He's supposed to be a point guard...not a SF...)

To be honest Magic just seems like a Dimer Lebron without the strength or shooting range.

I could see playing GP at PG and Magic at the 2 maybe. But playing magic at the 1 seems really silly unless your opponent is running LBJ at point.