Would you recommend 2k14 NG?

[quehouston]

The gameplay cannot be passed up, point blank.

[Mauer4MVP]

For those saying if your are an association guy then pass, why?

Is it simply because of VC (like needing to purchase an upgrade to edit rotations)?

Keep in mind that I don't want to control what other teams do.

[Knux-Future]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP

For those saying if your are an association guy then pass, why? Is it simply because of VC (like needing to purchase an upgrade to edit rotations)? Keep in mind that I don't want to control what other teams do.

If you want to run an assoication with default rosters only, no way to stop the CPU from making bad trades, no way to edit players with added fluff like talking to your owner, making sure fans and **** are hapy and what not.

Then go for it.

I don't think anyone will say its a bad game. It is just missing a lot of options that made a lot of us fans of the series and thus we feel ripped off because we are no longer getting what we have come to love (made worse by the fact that the options are there but 2k for some reason is stopping it. There is a create a character in the game it's used for the myplayer and draft class (which by the way is also ****ed). There was thigs like saving rosters to your harddrive, defensive options, being able to play other games in MyGM and stuff like allow us to overide trades aren't exactly difficult to implement. It just looks like 2K is ripping us off and forcing some to shell out more cash to play single player modes. All of this gets in the way for me as dispite the gae being fun, all of the other stuff and the potential butt ****ing 2k is trying just makes me hate it.

I could only reccomend it as a rental at best, definately not full price. 2K does not deserve it at this point. But if all those things don't bother you...then there isn't nothing that would ruin it for you

[bumpyface]

You're not going to find a better basketball game right now. Buy it.

[magicman32]

Hell yeah!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Cedrik]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP

For those saying if your are an association guy then pass, why? Is it simply because of VC (like needing to purchase an upgrade to edit rotations)? Keep in mind that I don't want to control what other teams do.

I don't like the whole VC/Goals part because when you play association (and basketball) your goal is to win titles etc. etc. I do like that you can get sacked but it shouldn't be goal driven in association.
In the end with me my ideal myGM would be a myAssociation with all the bells and whistles from NG myGM added to CG association mode (ie FULL CUSTOMIZATION OF EVERYTHING AND 30 TEAM CONTROL) and have the ability to toggle goals, cpu trades, player roles and trade override on/off.

[Rockie_Fresh88]

It depends If you like customizing your roster, more online modes etc then no you probably should stick to CG.


But let me say this the gameplay is top notch. If you prefer gameplay over features then get this game. Everything is so intense and fun every match feels different.

That's my only problem with the game. Well The menus are confusing and some modes feel lackadaisical.

[dre2]

Yes if you have someone to play it with, the actual on court game is quite good, no if you are a realism guy as there is now no way to simulate relatively accurate seasons in MyGm. No if you like online as 2K historically is TERIBBLE at providing a competent online service and so far the servers are a joke, also the modes for MyCareer and MyGm are online based because they are trying to put vc in them too so offline you don't have access to the full versions with all the purchaseable upgrades...overall I'd say no or at least wait until they get the thing to work since so much more of the game is vc based a lot of the features won't work until they fix the servers, troubling direction from a franchise I love...smh.