The Infamous Back Court Glitch

[tril]

Quote: Originally Posted by coolcras7

LOl the funniest part of the video is when he points out that the ref is right there as if the ref was a real person. It's a video game something things will not happen the way they were programed to, last year you were the one penalized for the most part it work they way it should now.

thats total immersion.. 2k is doing something right

[TheKasmar]

The bigger problem I have with that clip(the 2nd part) is the collision detection. His defender had his back turned to John Wall and was still able to initiate a bump animation. I wish stronger offensive players wouldnt give so much ground to the bump animations and we as users would be able to break out of the animation or stop our momentum sooner from going backwards. Not even the best defenders should be able to bump you like that. They should at least be facing the offensive player.

[rockchisler]

If I'm correct the ball has to go over and back not feet, that's like its not a touchdown in football if your feet cross but not the ball.

[Qui3tStorm617]

Just did a quick Google search on the NBA backcourt violation rule and this is what I found...


NBA Rules 101 — Backcourt Violations

The NBA rulebook states “A ball being dribbled is (1) in the frontcourt when the ball and both feet of the player are in the frontcourt, (2) in the backcourt if the ball or either foot of the player is in the backcourt”.

[UnbelievablyRAW]

I thought you were talking about the one in 2k12 where the other team knocks the ball backcourt, you get it, and they call 8 second violation....

[gento]

Quote: Originally Posted by Qui3tStorm617

Just did a quick Google search on the NBA backcourt violation rule and this is what I found... NBA Rules 101 — Backcourt Violations The NBA rulebook states “A ball being dribbled is (1) in the frontcourt when the ball and both feet of the player are in the frontcourt, (2) in the backcourt if the ball or either foot of the player is in the backcourt”.

and as shown in both clips... it should have been backcourt violations both times..

[ManiacMatt1782]

Quote: Originally Posted by gento

and as shown in both clips... it should have been FOUL both times..

Fixed it for you.

[Qui3tStorm617]

In regards to the first clip, I wasn't debating whether or not it's a foul or backcourt violation. What I'm pointing out is that NO CALL was made - not even a foul. The play just continues on as if nothing happend. How do you explain that?!