NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

[SteboSSK]

Quote: Originally Posted by jfsolo

I'm not one to get into debates about Overalls, as my philosophy is, get all the individual ratings right and whatever the Overall ends up being, so be it. With that being said though, if all the individual ratings are on point, IMO Tony Parker should be rated 2 or 3 points higher than Nash.

Its funny how you advocate the OVR shouldnt matter and say that if all the individual ratings things will be fine but then go on to say Parker should be 2-3 pts higher than Nash. 2-3 pts higher than Nash based on what analysis?

Nash is better than Parker in every area of offense than Parker outside of finishing at the rim. Parker is a better on ball defender but thats not really saying much since its Nash. If you have something to counter this argument feel free. Just dont come back without some facts or statistical analysis in your argument.

[Colts18]

Quote: Originally Posted by jfsolo

I'm not one to get into debates about Overalls, as my philosophy is, get all the individual ratings right and whatever the Overall ends up being, so be it. With that being said though, if all the individual ratings are on point, IMO Tony Parker should be rated 2 or 3 points higher than Nash.

You do understand that you paragraph is a contradiction?

[TJ820]

Signature Skills are

Steve Nash- Dimer, Floor General, Deadeye, Spot up Shooter

Danny Granger- Spot up Shooter, Active Hands, Heat Retention

Kenneth Faried- Hustle Points, Scrapper, Active Hands

[Belly_of_a_Whale]

287,000 followers.

We're due for three more. Gimme gimme gimme!

[icemanfrost]

Quote: Originally Posted by lv2bll

That's debatable, as a pure point yes, shooter yes. Consistency yes. Defensively no (albeit Tony isn't that great either) and finisher no. Who would i rather have on my team? Nash. With him you wouldn't need to run plays. Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Dude its not debatable tony parker was an MVP canidate most of the season if you are gonna break down by individual skills I can make a case for leonard being a better player than nash but that wouldn't be true.


Typical laker fan lol

[RedSceptile]

Quote: Originally Posted by sO100

Second year all defense for the first time since 05 lol what do you want his defense to be sir?

Kobe hasn't been an All Defensive player in almost 3 seasons. He's getting by just on reputation now.

[SteboSSK]

Quote: Originally Posted by icemanfrost

Dude its not debatable tony parker was an MVP canidate most of the season if you are gonna break down by individual skills I can make a case for leonard being a better player than nash but that wouldn't be true. Typical laker fan lol

How is this a typical Laker fan reply when any Suns fan would argue the same. Tony Parker was in the MVP race b/c the Spurs were racking up wins. Thats how the MVP works. Nash is better than Parker in every area of offense outside of finishing at the rim. Its that simple. If you want to debate the facts then lets do that but arguing your feelings and taking shots at what team a person roots for takes away from the real debate.

[Neoda2khead]

I don't feel like everyone even deserves a skill . Nash could get dimer and floor general but ratings should still be the main thing that determines how good someone is . For example ... Raja bell is a good on-ball defender but not of the caliber of a Andre Iggy . So therefore u give Iggy the lockdown defender and don't give it to bell . Simply because all raja needs to play defense would be his regular defensive rating .