NBA 2K14 Player Ratings Released So Far

[stillfeelme]

Quote: Originally Posted by Fnixon

https://twitter.com/Ronnie2K/status/379051739023822848 as per Ronnie- the ratings don't actually mean anything anyway- so who cares!

Harrison Barnes (76) doesn't really like his rating. Doesn't seem too bad though. He is athletic can put you on a poster, questionable midrange game good 3pt shooter not a bad rebounder for his position.

Harden (89) as long as he is an average defender and below average midrange game and definitely turnover prone.

[bryandfor3]

Quote: Originally Posted by stillfeelme

Harrison Barnes (76) doesn't really like his rating. Doesn't seem too bad though. He is athletic can put you on a poster, questionable midrange game good 3pt shooter not a bad rebounder for his position. Harden (89) as long as he is an average defender and below average midrange game and definitely turnover prone.

As a UNC fan watching him, one of HB's strengths as a player is his pull up midrange jumper after a dribble or two. He just struggles creating his own shot and getting to the rim, and making use of his size. I do agree with you about Harden though

I do wonder why 2K has Noel's rating 2 points higher than Drummond's 70 in 2K13. Noel I think is a slightly better shot blocker, and Drummond a better rebounder. But I think the Living Rosters should make up that disparity. Plus Drummond's rating hasn't been released yet so we'll see

[Melbournelad]

Quote: Originally Posted by Xxstr8xRecklessxX

dang.... paul george getting a lot of debate being a 88 to high i mean being a bulls fan this guy really did his best in the playoffs and has the chance to prove himself being a star ( 90 rating ) but really i need to watch paul more cuz like roy hibbert said on the on his interview against the heat,'" yall mother F---Kers dont watch us play out the the year" i agree pacers get no respect to be on national TV look at heat ,bulls,Lakers, knicks, thunder schedule on NBA . com and compare it to pacers schedule numbers of being on National TV than those teams so ill keep it an 88 for him and 81 for Roy right now both players have potential of doing more better upcoming season than Danny who gotta be like a like a 78 from missing the season........same for rose but a different number like a 87 than a 92

90...star? I think you mean MVP caliber player. 85 would be superstar and 80 borderline allstar.

[stillfeelme]

Quote: Originally Posted by bryandfor3

As a UNC fan watching him, one of HB's strengths as a player is his pull up midrange jumper after a dribble or two. He just struggles creating his own shot and getting to the rim, and making use of his size. I do agree with you about Harden though I do wonder why 2K has Noel's rating 2 points higher than Drummond's 70 in 2K13. Noel I think is a slightly better shot blocker, and Drummond a better rebounder. But I think the Living Rosters should make up that disparity. Plus Drummond's rating hasn't been released yet so we'll see

Barnes is just not a great midrange shooter percentage wise yet. Once that improves it will open up his game a little bit more. He is not a setup guy to get assists, so his ratings don't get a chance to get inflated by being well rounded. I am sure his vertical and dunking ratings are high but I bet his jump shooting ratings are average or below average besides 3point shooting.

Concerning Noel I don't know something as simple as defensive awareness/ consistency can inflate the overall. I think Drummond is on the brink of being very good because he has a high motor and has the athleticism of someone much smaller. He rebounds at a very high rate and really can't be blocked out constantly. Plus he needs zero plays ran for him to be a force. Noel should be faster though but Drummond appears to be stronger. Like you said most of this will get sorted out once the rosters get updated.

[CK_ColdGame]

I agreed with someone saying Hibbert shouldve been the highest rated Pacer

[DavidTheGreat20]

Quote: Originally Posted by BADBOYS3

Curious to see what KCP & Drummond have

Same here bro. I'm hoping Drummond gets at least 73 overall

Sent through Tapatalk.

[Melbournelad]

Quote: Originally Posted by DavidTheGreat20

Same here bro. I'm hoping Drummond gets at least 73 overall Sent through Tapatalk.

Mate after Drummond's historical rookie season (in terms of advanced stats), i'm expecting at least a 76-78 for him. And i think 2k's ratings are too high for most players. But Drummond's rookie season was that good.

[Sundown]

Quote: Originally Posted by Melbournelad

Mate after Drummond's historical rookie season (in terms of advanced stats), i'm expecting at least a 76-78 for him. And i think 2k's ratings are too high for most players. But Drummond's rookie season was that good.

In limited minutes off the bench on a terrible team. Per 36 isn't that useful a stat. 70-73 is fine for him as long as he excels in his proper areas.

2k also needs to take care of the massive overrating of limited minutes sixth men as starters. They say they're aware of the problem but Crawford continues to have an 80.