Celtics Court 2k12 vs Real comparison

[coolcras7]

Quote: Originally Posted by RleWorm

quick question...why aren't they allowed to use TD Garden,Conseco,MSG? And they can use other real arenas

Because they have to pay for the rights, and I would imagine the price being alot.

[Pared]

Quote: Originally Posted by Iman2907

Imagine lakers home court was dark ? I know 10000 threads will be made & 2k will no time fix it. Im praying they patch this asap

Please - lay off the "if this team's court was bad" comparisons.

It has nothing to do with what team it is.

[VDusen04]

Quote: Originally Posted by elprez98

I think my biggest problem with threads like this is that it just seems (my opinion) like posters are overlooking everything else in the game: amazing tats, hella different shoes, signature shots, new post game, potentially an online association. 2k games are arguably the most detailed sports games on the market right now, then people come on and say....."I don't understand why they can't get this right." To me, posts like that seem just a bit disingenuous considering how much they do get right. Pointing it out for developers to see and hopefully have time to correct is fine. That only helps the game get better. However, the posters hardly ever seem to come off with constructive criticism and just seems like a nit-picky complaint. Again, just my opinion.

Spot on. There's always a right and wrong way to present things.

[dRoseBulls]

Quote: Originally Posted by elprez98

I think my biggest problem with threads like this is that it just seems (my opinion) like posters are overlooking everything else in the game: amazing tats, hella different shoes, signature shots, new post game, potentially an online association. 2k games are arguably the most detailed sports games on the market right now, then people come on and say....."I don't understand why they can't get this right." To me, posts like that seem just a bit disingenuous considering how much they do get right. Pointing it out for developers to see and hopefully have time to correct is fine. That only helps the game get better. However, the posters hardly ever seem to come off with constructive criticism and just seems like a nit-picky complaint. Again, just my opinion.

they do a lot of things right, otherwise i wouldn't buy the game every year (since 2k1!!). i'm just saying they can do way better in this area.

they have the nba licence, the game needs to be more accurate imo. they haven't changed many of their textures since 2k9 (and i know it, i've been pathing for years now). court colors are wrong every year! even jersey colors!

you can hate ea sports for many things, but when it comes to accuracy of jersey colors, stadiums etc. they do a fantastic job. just look at the new fifa or nhl.

don't get me wrong, nba 2k is a great game otherwise.

[SoxFan01605]

Quote: Originally Posted by elprez98

I think my biggest problem with threads like this is that it just seems (my opinion) like posters are overlooking everything else in the game: amazing tats, hella different shoes, signature shots, new post game, potentially an online association. 2k games are arguably the most detailed sports games on the market right now, then people come on and say....."I don't understand why they can't get this right." To me, posts like that seem just a bit disingenuous considering how much they do get right. Pointing it out for developers to see and hopefully have time to correct is fine. That only helps the game get better. However, the posters hardly ever seem to come off with constructive criticism and just seems like a nit-picky complaint. Again, just my opinion.

While this is a fair point in general, I don't think it fully applies to these types problem in particular or the OP's post. I do agree it could have been nicer to leave out the "why can't they..." comment, but he patches the game's visuals for PC, posted images to support his point and showed how he, as a user, was able to come closer than 2K. I would call that mostly constructive.

The other thing is, and this is an issue with 2K sports in general, is that their color palette is just off....most of the early PC mods are spent fixing color issues in uniforms, accessories, courts, etc. While the specific flaws pointed out go a bit beyond coloring (as in the floor textures, etc) a lot could be fixed by simply using the right shade of green, not making red look pink, black look grey, etc.

So while I agree that the "how can they not get___" type arguments can get tiring, I don't think it's as egregious here. It is indeed a bit odd that something as basic as color scheme can continually be so off. This isn't the same as someone questioning how they can't get something seemingly simple but potentially difficult to program.

Again, not saying the OP couldn't have been more tactful in his OP...just saying he posed a fair question IMO.

[jersez]

Quote: Originally Posted by dRoseBulls

you can hate ea sports for many things, but when it comes to accuracy of jersey colors, stadiums etc. they do a fantastic job. just look at the new fifa or nhl. don't get me wrong, nba 2k is a great game otherwise.

It's funny because I was playing NBA Live 10 with my little brother, and I saw how they had alot of Authentic things, Courts looked good, Jersey color was accurate at the time, every accessories was there you can even make an accessory, atmosphere setting. I still wouldn't trade 2k gameplay for all of that, but it would be nice if they added or fixed these things. a

[Iman2907]

cmon, look at this. NBA live 10 destroys NBA 2k12 Bostons home court

live 10 is spot onnnn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOB_zMCBojc

[dukedude24]

Quote: Originally Posted by Iman2907

cmon, look at this. NBA live 10 destroys NBA 2k12 Bostons home court live 10 is spot onnnn http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOB_zMCBojc

someone ban this guy, he has been trolling on the forum for quite some time now......

go play ur NBA live 2012.....oh...nvm