NCAA 14 - OS Community + Playmakers Split Sliders

[TheUFGuy]

So I just got done with this game using ver. 10. I was Cal rated in the low 80's and UCLa was in the low 90's. I threw two pick six's my first two passes but then settled down and dominated. I didn't punt once. I feel that the HUM defense vs CPU offense played fantastic. But, I moved the ball wayyyy to easy. I had my way threw the air. Which inevitably set up the easy run. Is there a way we can tighten up the CPU DB's? Thanks again for the great sliders. And let me know of there is any way I can help contribute.

[Matt10]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheUFGuy

So I just got done with this game using ver. 10. I was Cal rated in the low 80's and UCLa was in the low 90's. I threw two pick six's my first two passes but then settled down and dominated. I didn't punt once. I feel that the HUM defense vs CPU offense played fantastic. But, I moved the ball wayyyy to easy. I had my way threw the air. Which inevitably set up the easy run. Is there a way we can tighten up the CPU DB's? Thanks again for the great sliders. And let me know of there is any way I can help contribute.

Man, it looks like they ran pretty good. Just couldn't throw. What part do you think was easy about passing for the user? Is CPU too aggressive in their covering Or too passive?

[TheUFGuy]

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt10

Man, it looks like they ran pretty good. Just couldn't throw. What part do you think was easy about passing for the user? Is CPU too aggressive in their covering Or too passive?

Honestly Matt, I sat in quarters/dime/dollar almost the whole game because of their HUNH. So as you can see they couldn't pass on me at all, but their read option/draw killed me.

I just felt that my WR's blew right past them the whole game and then When they didn't get right past them the coverage was very loose And none of my WR's are above a 87. And their DB's are solidly rated. I would have no problem with 400 yds passing especially from an "air raid" team like Cal over an inferior opponent. But I purposely played highly rated UCLA in their own house to see what I could do.

[Solidice]

with version 7, played my Bowl game, which ended up being against Michigan State instead of FSU.

Spoiler

Massachusetts Minutemen at Michigan State Spartans
Jan 1, 2015	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
Massachusetts Minutemen (6-6)	7	10	7	3	27
Michigan State Spartans (7-5)	10	7	7	7	31

Team Stats Comparison
	MASS	MSU
Total Offense	448	370
Rushing Yards	159	156
Passing Yards	289	214
First Downs	21	15
Punt Return Yards	26	7
Kick Return Yards	34	109
Total Yards	508	486
Turnovers	0	0
3rd Down Converstion	5-10	4-9
4th Down Conversion	0-1	0-0
2-Point Conversion	0-0	0-0
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals	5-3-2	4-3-1
Penalties	1-5	1-5
Posession Time	18:07	13:53

Massachusetts Minutemen PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Mike Wegzyn 18/28 289 3 0 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Jordan Broadnax 15 77 5.1 0 Mike Wegzyn 14 72 5.1 0 Matt Carini 7 10 1.4 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Bernard Davis 7 67 9.5 2 Tajae Sharpe 4 63 15.7 0 D.J. woods 3 93 31.0 0 Jaurice Jones 1 10 10.0 1 Derek Beck 1 16 16.0 0 Sharif Custis 1 10 10.0 0 Jordan Broadnax 1 30 30.0 0 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD Randall 8 0.0 0 0 Javon Santos-Knox 7 1.0 0 0 Kassan Messiah 7 0.0 0 0 D'Metrius Williams 6 0.0 0 0 Brian Huggins 5 1.0 0 0 Khary Bailey-Smith 4 0.0 0 0 Ed Saint-Vil 3 0.0 0 0 Quayshun Smith 1 0.0 0 0 Joe Larkin 1 0.0 0 0 Shane Huber 1 0.0 0 0 Daniel Maynes 1 0.0 0 0 John Robinson 1 0.0 0 0 Peter Angeh 1 0.0 0 0 Peter Ngobidi 1 0.0 0 0 Trey Dudley-Giles 1 0.0 0 0 KICKING FG XP PTS LONG Blake Lucas 2/2 3/3 9 23 PUNTING NO YDS AVG IN20 Dedrick Porter 2 76 38.0 0 KICK RETURN RET YDS AVG TD D.J. Woods 1 34 34.0 0 PUNT RETURN RET YDS AVG TD D.J. Woods 2 26 13.0 0

Michigan State Spartans PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Connor Cook 13/17 214 1 0 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Nick Hill 22 135 6.1 2 Jeremy Langford 4 8 2.0 0 Connor cook 4 6 1.5 0 Trevon Pendleton 2 7 3.5 1 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Nick Hill 3 33 11.0 1 Keith Humphrey 3 83 27.6 0 Paul Lang 2 31 15.5 0 Aaron Burbridge 2 13 6.5 0 Jeremy Langford 2 35 17.5 0 Andre Sims 1 19 19.0 0 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD R.J. Williams 12 0.0 0 0 Kurtis Drummond 7 0.0 0 0 Mylan Hicks 6 0.0 0 0 Jon Reschke 6 1.0 0 0 Demetriuos Cox 3 0.0 0 0 Trae Waynes 3 0.0 0 0 Joel Heath 2 0.0 0 0 Ezra Robinson 2 0.0 0 0 Shilique Calhoun 2 1.0 0 0 Ed Davis 2 0.0 0 0 Damon Knox 2 0.0 0 0 Arjen Colquhoun 2 0.0 0 0 Taiwan Jones 2 0.0 0 0 James Kittredge 1 1.0 0 0 Desmond Walter 1 0.0 0 0 KICKING FG XP PTS LONG Michael Geiger 1/1 4/4 7 39 PUNTING NO YDS AVG IN20 Mike Sadler 3 150 50.0 1 KICK RETURN RET YDS AVG TD Andre Sims 3 83 27.6 0 Tony Lippett 1 26 26.0 0 PUNT RETURN RET YDS AVG TD Andre Sims 1 7 7.0 0

It ended up much closer than I thought it would. I had a chance to try to win late, but simply ran out of time when inside their 30.

Season 3 looks to be promising, my team has improved to 77 Ovr, with I believe 83 Offense. my QB is a Senior at 93 Ovr, and 8 of 11 starters on defense are all seniors as well. Hoping to make a run at the MAC championship this year as next year may be tough with all the graduating players.

[jp18]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheUFGuy

Honestly Matt, I sat in quarters/dime/dollar almost the whole game because of their HUNH. So as you can see they couldn't pass on me at all, but their read option/draw killed me. I just felt that my WR's blew right past them the whole game and then When they didn't get right past them the coverage was very loose And none of my WR's are above a 87. And their DB's are solidly rated. I would have no problem with 400 yds passing especially from an "air raid" team like Cal over an inferior opponent. But I purposely played highly rated UCLA in their own house to see what I could do.

This is where the sliders fail to a degree. Cal at no point in time should be shutting down ucla's pass game when only rushing 3 or 4 gives more time in the pocket and wrs should be getting open. The rushing makes sense they given cal is out manned in the trenches. Depending on pressure ucla should have been much better at throwing.

[Matt10]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheUFGuy

Honestly Matt, I sat in quarters/dime/dollar almost the whole game because of their HUNH. So as you can see they couldn't pass on me at all, but their read option/draw killed me. I just felt that my WR's blew right past them the whole game and then When they didn't get right past them the coverage was very loose And none of my WR's are above a 87. And their DB's are solidly rated. I would have no problem with 400 yds passing especially from an "air raid" team like Cal over an inferior opponent. But I purposely played highly rated UCLA in their own house to see what I could do.

Thanks for the explanation. That was perfect. I think we can easily fix those issues with PCV and/or INT honestly. Everything else looks to be on point - I'll get right to work

Quote: Originally Posted by jp18

This is where the sliders fail to a degree. Cal at no point in time should be shutting down ucla's pass game when only rushing 3 or 4 gives more time in the pocket and wrs should be getting open. The rushing makes sense they given cal is out manned in the trenches. Depending on pressure ucla should have been much better at throwing.

I definitely agree, jp. I think that's what is nice about this slider set though - we can easily modify just ONE value and possibly see what needs to be seen. Who would ever think that on zero threshold the coverage for the user would be TOO GOOD? Not I, that is for sure.

The trick is to get it loose enough where it looks correct. I do not want loose coverage and see in replay the the DB just chose to freeze in his spot for split second to allow the receiver to get past - no way.

I'll be working on this the rest of the day, guys. Expect a very slight tweak to that post and the OP. I also updated with the spreadsheet for those that can't see the image. Thanks!

Edit Update: changed OPI from 75 to 45

[Matt10]

Version 10 testing:

Watch live video from Matt10l on www.twitch.tv

[Maverick2790]

This was a game where defense dominated. It was my first time using VERSION 10.

Michigan had two turnovers in the red zone. One fumble on a QB scramble and a dropped pass by the TE that fell into my trailing safeties hands.

I had a ridiculous stat of NINE sacks this game, but it was less of a stellar pass rush, and more of the QB scrambling. The reason why the QB was sacked so much was because instead of turning up field, the QB would run horizontally allowing my DEs to trip him up.

Indiana is rated in the mid 85s and Michigan was in the low 90s. I am using the 2014/2015 updated rosters here on OS and this is my first season. Previous games were using Version 6/7.

I liked how tough it was to move the ball on a good defense, but I didnt like how easy it was for me to shut down their running game (RB also ran horizontally) and shut down a dual threat QB who ran horizontally instead of up the field. Other than that, I really enjoyed it.

Keep it up Matt!

Indiana Hoosiers at Michigan Wolverines
Jul 10, 2014	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
#11 Indiana Hoosiers (5-0)	0	3	7	7	17
Michigan Wolverines (4-2)	6	0	0	0	6

Team Stats Comparison
	IND	MICH
Total Offense	237	242
Rushing Yards	28-76-1	35-82-0
Passing Yards	161	160
First Downs	15	15
Punt Return Yards	14	12
Kick Return Yards	53	85
Total Yards	304	339
Turnovers	1 Int	2Int/1Fum
3rd Down Converstion	2-10	5-12
4th Down Conversion	3-3 (Kicker sucks)	0-0
2-Point Conversion	0	0
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals	3-2	3-0-1
Penalties	0	0
Posession Time	15:30	16:30

Indiana Hoosiers PASSING C/A YDS TD INT QB1 16/30 161 1 1 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD RB1 22 88 4.0 0 RB2 1 1 1 1 RB3 1 8 8 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD WR1 4 67 16.7 1 WR2 4 34 8.5 0 WR3 2 14 7 0 TE1 2 14 7 0 BLOCKING PANCAKE SACK LT 0 1 RT 0 2 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD RE 7 4 0 0 ROLB 4 2 0 0 CB2 2 0 1 0 FS 7 0 1 0

Michigan Wolverines PASSING C/A YDS TD INT QB1 15 21 0 2 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD QB1 2 Fumbles 1 T.O. 18 31 1.7 0 RB1 (INJURED) 4 23 5.7 0 RB2 13 28 2.1 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD WR3 5 34 6.8 0 TE1 3 45 15.0 0 WR2 3 47 15.6 0 WR1 2 16 8 0 BLOCKING PANCAKE SACK LG 1 0 RT 0 1 RG 0 4 C 0 2 LT 0 2 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD LE 6 2 0 0 RE 1 1 0 0 CB2 6 0 1 0