UCLA collection

[marks0124]

Quote: Originally Posted by michiganfan8620

People have been expecting Georgia, auburn, Clemson, and oregon for awhile now, that's why people are probably upset. Some people put a lot of coins into acquiring multiples of the silvers, and the last couple weeks brought unexpected teams.

I hope people aren't expecting to make a ton of coins on the Oregon/UGA pending collections. The AH is going to be full of these cards when they are released - people have been hoarding for these collections for months.

As long as we aren't getting more 97/98 QB's and they are releasing collections - I'm happy.

[NCStateHokie]

I'm disappointed because they EA seemed to be doing collections for teams that have had recent success in football. Since 2003 UCLA is 74-68 ( my math could be wrong) and that too me is the definition of mediocrity.

[michiganfan8620]

Quote: Originally Posted by marks0124

I hope people aren't expecting to make a ton of coins on the Oregon/UGA pending collections. The AH is going to be full of these cards when they are released - people have been hoarding for these collections for months. As long as we aren't getting more 97/98 QB's and they are releasing collections - I'm happy.

Price all depends on what the reward is. A ton of people had the FSU guys, and they still went for a ton since the reward was 99 Brooks. Nobody had the Cal guys and they are worth almost nothing.

[BadgerFanatic]

People aren't happy about a UCLA collection? Can't wait until next week's freak out over an Alabama 2.0 collection. Would be a great way for EA to stick it to those of us who like to hoard/plan ahead.

[stand ur ground]

Haha. That would be downright evil of ea. they would recieve plenty of hate emails from this guy. Would be a good april fools joke though.

Maybe give you a 99 julio jones as a reward that after a month morphs into a kyle orton.. Thatd be solid.

[Kennedyisdead]

Quote: Originally Posted by NCStateHokie

I'm disappointed because they EA seemed to be doing collections for teams that have had recent success in football. Since 2003 UCLA is 74-68 ( my math could be wrong) and that too me is the definition of mediocrity.

And NCState has been good? You would love that right? Im sure UCLA fans loved it, I love smaller schools getting collections, nice change of pace.

[NCStateHokie]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kennedyisdead

And NCState has been good? You would love that right? Im sure UCLA fans loved it, I love smaller schools getting collections, nice change of pace.

Please point to where I ever said NC State has been good. And UCLA as a "smaller" school? Have you ever been to southern California? UCLA's enrollment is 42,000 plus. Not exactly the definition of a small school.

[sherlockparks]

The ucla question was frustrating since I didn't have any of the cards saved up but it's a nice collection and a solid reward that was well needed! I'm happy with it. Auburn next week anyone?!?!? Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk