Top 25 halfbacks

[conboy31]

Quote: Originally Posted by The Soldier

1. They really need to have a renovation in ratings. 25 90+? They need to do it like the college Bball games:

I am late getting to this thread, but the first thing I noticed was that AT LEAST 25 rbs are > 90 rating. Inflated much?

[Dez]

Yes he is...........

[Nivek]

Quote: Originally Posted by southernbelle

*cough*, *cough*... lorenzo booker?... *cough*, *cough*...

He was nothing special on the football field last year; no o-line = no stats. He's prolly around 88.

[elicoleman]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dez

Yes he is...........

Is he a good RB? Yes
Is he a top 25 back? No

Go back and look at that list...please tell me exactly who McGill should be over?

[Nivek]

Quote: Originally Posted by elicoleman

Is he a good RB? Yes Is he a top 25 back? No Go back and look at that list...please tell me exactly who McGill should be over?

I'd replace him with Tony Hunt; I thihk he's overrated.

[tigerfan2]

You know I am sure Bush is good, but I have never seen him do anything. But then again I don't know his stats or anything.

[AuburnAlumni]

Quote: Originally Posted by no_homerism

OK, fans of various schools, just because your school's RB is good or even great doesn't mean he's top-25. As for the ratings, the 98, etc.: to the guy who said only Bo, etc. should be 98s, EA ranks the players every year in comparison to eachother, not in comparison to historical players.

Even compared to other backs, Peterson is rated waaaaaay too high. He's a very very good back...but he's not a "98 Break tackle" type of back. They made him just about unstoppable. He was far from unstoppable in real life.

EA went on a "90+" rating rampage this season.

[Dez]

Bush is a decent back, has good speed and great size. He is hard to get down when he starts going. But, he is no Ronnie McGill.