Anyone else hating the fumbles more than the INTs?....

[GTR34]

I know I am.

Its quite strange really. In my CL my running back has a 97 carry rating, but in 10 games he has fumbled almost every game, sometime twice, for a grand total of 16 fumbles. I know for a fact that if I could use the challenge feature I could get back at least 5-7 of those, but then I'd be around 10 fumbles, or 1 per game.

I use the protect ball button whenever I go inside the box, and sometimes even then my guy will cough up the ball.

I'm assuming that there isn't much I can do about this, so I guess this is just me blowing off some steam. Just frustrating to see a talented back with high carry ratings boot the ball so much.

[rspencer86]

IMO, the interceptions are FAR worse than the fumbles. I really haven't had a problem with fumbles.

[GTR34]

Well at least with the INTs you can limit them via sliders (0 knock, 50-75 INT), but with the fumbles all you can do (I think) would be boost the RB ability, but then you are also boosting his ability to slitter his way through traffic....

[rspencer86]

Maybe it's because the sliders I use have fairly low tackle settings. Seems like the higher the tackle slider, the more fumbles you'll see.

[andy4theherd]

i'm avg 2 fumbles a game...

the int's suck too...

[superjames1992]

The INTs don't bother me much, but the fumbles can get ridiculous like last year.

[nymets3000]

Both can get pretty bad. Fumbles might be worse because they aren't really your fault.

[rudyjuly2]

I haven't had a problem with fumbles too much. INTs are much worse imo but not a gamekiller for me. The CPU has been throwing between 0 and 2 in all of my last 6 or 7 games so I'm happy. Too bad I keep throwing a ton.