NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

[AuburnAlumni]

Quote: Originally Posted by auburntigersfan

lol, I would say these will definitely change before release or there will be some really happy fans in florida, and some upset auburn fans.

I'll put money down right now that Florida still has a higher defensive rating..along with about 10-15 other teams....than Auburn at release.

Guaranteed.

In my personal dynasty, it won't matter because I will do my own edits, etc.

But in my online dynasty....ugh.

[bad_philanthropy]

So the tentative top 25 is

1 Georgia
2 Oklahoma
3 Ohio State
4 USC
5 Florida
6 LSU
7 Missouri
8 West Virginia
9 Wisconsin
10 Texas
11 Clemson
12 Texas Tech
13 Penn State
14 Arizona State
15 Kansas
16 Auburn
17 Virginia Tech
18 Illinois
19 Tennessee
20 BYU
21 South Carolina
22 Alabama
23 Oregon
24 Cincinatti
25 Wake Forest

[Solidice]

i think there will be alot of changes to come, or at least i hope, the gaps from the high-end to middle seems a little high and the gap from middle to low-end seems even bigger. if not, then playing as Western Kentucky should be a huge challenge. looks like they have a 30 overall, 40 or 48 offense, 33 defense.

[AuburnAlumni]

Quote: Originally Posted by bad_philanthropy

So the tentative top 25 is 1 Georgia 2 Oklahoma 3 Ohio State 4 USC 5 Florida 6 LSU 7 Missouri 8 West Virginia 9 Wisconsin 10 Texas 11 Clemson 12 Texas Tech 13 Penn State 14 Arizona State 15 Kansas 16 Auburn 17 Virginia Tech 18 Illinois 19 Tennessee 20 BYU 21 South Carolina 22 Alabama 23 Oregon 24 Cincinatti 25 Wake Forest

What's funny though is the RANKINGS mean squat.

The RATINGS is where its at and most likely a team like FSU will be "unranked" yet have a RATING higher than over half of the Top 25 teams.

That's usually how it goes.

[auburntigersfan]

Quote: Originally Posted by AuburnAlumni

I'll put money down right now that Florida still has a higher defensive rating..along with about 10-15 other teams....than Auburn at release. Guaranteed. In my personal dynasty, it won't matter because I will do my own edits, etc. But in my online dynasty....ugh.

our defense should be great if that new d-coordinator doesn't mess it up. I just hope our secondary can keep up with the rest of the D, we got sen'derrick marks, tray blackmon, and our new juco transfer raven gray. We should have a solid D.
At least benjamin's a beast
http://www.gamespot.com/video/944961...meplay-movie-7
by the way on another gameplay I saw that they had our new hd screen in the game

[Cebby]

Quote: Originally Posted by Solidice

i think there will be alot of changes to come, or at least i hope, the gaps from the high-end to middle seems a little high and the gap from middle to low-end seems even bigger. if not, then playing as Western Kentucky should be a huge challenge. looks like they have a 30 overall, 40 or 48 offense, 33 defense.

The gaps are a little off, but at least there is a gap, as opposed to the Dukes and Temples getting C+.

In reality though, UGA should be the highest team at about a 92, then the rest of the top 5 at 91ish, then the ranked teams in the 80s, mid tier bowl teams in the 70s/upper 60s, bad teams in the 50s, and Sun Belt, WAC, and MAC teams in the 40s.

There's not a preseason 2004 USC or 2002 Miami team going into this year, so there shouldn't be a team rated that high.

[gschwendt]

Any chance we could get a typed-out list or something zoomed in to the right side itself? I realize beggars can't be choosers but I can't read hardly any of them... at least not the ones I'm interested in.

[bjf1377]

Most importantly, by paying attention tot he background, it looks as if Kent State will have their stadium in the game finally (even though they are re-doing it, so that won't really be accurate, haha)