Home

NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

This is a discussion on NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots within the NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > NCAA Football
The Best Sports Game of 2019: MLB The Show 19
The Best Franchise Mode of 2019: NBA 2K20's MyLeague
Worst Trend in Sports Games in 2019: Single-Player Modes Getting Shafted
Who wins Super Bowl LIV? -- Click here to cast your vote now!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-14-2008, 12:17 PM   #17
KG
Welcome Back
 
KG's Arena
 
OVR: 35
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,063
Blog Entries: 1
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

USC's defense looks incredible again
__________________
Twitter Instagram - kgx2thez
KG is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 12:23 PM   #18
Pro
 
Soonerd2's Arena
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Jul 2006
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Can't believe Demarco Murray didn't crack that list for OU. Great O-line though. Can't remember if Sam Bradford was a 94 or 92 but thats awesome for a sophmore QB.

Weird that in the initial rosters a sophmore can be 92-94 ish but when your dynasty is 5 or 6 years down the road I can't get a sophmore that highly rated. Maybe because of a redshirt I guess, but I don't recall that high of an improvement.
Soonerd2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 12:35 PM   #19
Wahoo Wah
 
CM Hooe's Arena
 
OVR: 45
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 18,761
Blog Entries: 2
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Pretty fair assessment of Virginia (at least looking at their top six players), except that Vic Hall (CB #4) shouldn't be our best corner. At all.

Also, looking at both the player and team ratings, why is Florida State so good? They've been a middling team in the ACC for a few years now.
__________________
Christopher Hooe
CM Hooe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 12:35 PM   #20
MVP
 
OVR: 17
Join Date: Aug 2002
Blog Entries: 1
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soonerd2
Can't believe Demarco Murray didn't crack that list for OU. Great O-line though. Can't remember if Sam Bradford was a 94 or 92 but thats awesome for a sophmore QB.

Weird that in the initial rosters a sophmore can be 92-94 ish but when your dynasty is 5 or 6 years down the road I can't get a sophmore that highly rated. Maybe because of a redshirt I guess, but I don't recall that high of an improvement.
It has always been that case. EA has never allowed for players to match up to the default rosters. SOPH will never be able to be as good as default roster SOPH down the line and SRs will never be able to be as bad as default SRs. They are yet to figure out I guess how to pull this off with their current progression strategy that simply increases everyone's ratings a set amount every year based on potential. The idea of guys not panning out is not possible to implement.
Keyser Soze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 12:35 PM   #21
Guns Up!
 
Solidice's Arena
 
OVR: 63
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 9,469
Blog Entries: 41
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Texas Tech looks good.

Graham Harrell(QB) - 96 ovr
Michael Crabtree(WR) - 96 ovr
Louis Vasquez(LG) - 90 ovr
Jamar Wall(CB) - 89 ovr
Rylan Reed(LT) - 89 ovr

based on that the impact players will(should) be Harrell, Crabtree, and Wall.
Solidice is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 05-14-2008, 12:35 PM   #22
MVP
 
noplace's Arena
 
OVR: 13
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Austin Tx
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Someone needs to let EA know about position changes. Cody Glenn for Nebraska has been moved to LB & is starting so far.
noplace is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 12:36 PM   #23
Pro
 
Dbrentonbuck's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2006
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Ok, whoever did this list knows nothing about UC football. Mickens and Byrd are right I guess, but there is no way QB Dustin Grutza is an 87. Maybe a 78. I would say he should be ranked nearly the same as Dimitrius Jones and Chazz Anderson. Hell, even the coach doesn't think Grutza is a good QB.

"If we get Ben Mauk back, we’ll be happy. But look, we can’t cry over it. Dustin Grutza will have to be the guy and we’re going to have to win with him. We can’t trade him. We can’t get another guy for him. We think he can do the job. If he’s our starter, we’ll get it done. We’ll find a way” Brian Kelly

Does that sound like the guy is an 87 ranked QB?

And I don't see how two players who have never played DE made it into the top 7 players when UC has some very good recievers, corner backs (one just transferred from tOSU) and line backers. No way Dustin "We can't trade him" Grutza is in the top 7 players on this team.
Dbrentonbuck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 01:14 PM   #24
MVP
 
jdrhammer's Arena
 
OVR: 19
Join Date: Feb 2008
Re: NCAA Football 09 Beta Player Rating Screenshots

Quote:
Originally Posted by naughty9
WHOA...I just noticed something, these ratings cannot be final. Look at Miss St. roster. There is no Dixon #24 on there. He is definately there second best player.behind Pegues.
I agree completely. Dixon should be about a 90-92. The guy is a beast and carried them on his back. Pegues shouldn't be rated much higher OVR, but his speed should be around 95.

Ole Miss has a Tillman rated too high, and Peria Jerry rated too low. That should be easy to fix.
jdrhammer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > NCAA Football »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Top -