My Thoughts on the Game

[z Revis]

I actually traded in Madden to get this game. I didn't want to get rid of Madden, but at the same time I wanted this game. Last year I played NCAA 09 way more than Madden. And while Madden is a lot better this year, IMO, I still figured NCAA 10 would get more playing time from me. And it has. I'm not regretting my decision to trade Madden in one bit. This is a fun game. And honestly, that's all I ask for from video games. Sure it has it's problems, and sure I've complained about some of them, but it all comes down to having fun and I'm certainly enjoying NCAA Football 10.

[Bender18]

I have found the coverage to be pretty good with decent sliders as well. And of course... it is just a video game. Sure, the stats might not always be like they are in real life, but it's still fun.

And there are certain things you can do in this game to have a slight advantage over the computer. But if you show some restraint and mix your playcall up, the game plays amazingly well.

[dp68]

Quote: Originally Posted by nikpin

Yea this is a pretty sad post. Play me online and we'll see how well 4 verticals and slants work. It's called adjusting coverages!

You didn't read the post from start to finish, or you didn't comprehend. You tell me?

As stated, I was in "coach mode." The whole point is that the cpu defense doesn't adjust its coverages, and no matter what play it calls, it can't stop slants and verticals because the secondary doesn't know how to cover.

Sad response on your part. Read the post first. Then respond.

[dp68]

Quote: Originally Posted by jbrew2411

I have to say you are wrong. The pass coverage is not top notich but with the right sliders it can be good. I happen to know a little about football (high school coach with a state ring) and this game is not like real life football but that is becuase it is a video game.

According to the promotion, it's realistic. Which is clearly misinformation.

Well I just coached Army to a 59-47 win over Auburn using 8 minute quarters. Called slant after slant, threw a few verticals for easy touchdowns. And Army is a run-option team with a terrible QB and WR set.

What I find truly disheartening is how many people are defending this horrible AI. It's not a fun game if a 5 year old can exploit it. It's 2010. How about expecting some decent AI from the most powerful software gaming company on the planet? For crying out loud, FPS Pro has been gone for 12 years and EA still can't approach its sophistication.

[Playmakers]

This is by far my favorite sports game from last year. I'll be playing it until NCAA 11 is released

It's very close in terms of gameplay and animations to NCAA 06 which was my favorite version even til this day.

[prototype561]

Yeah people know thats its a videogame, but the problem is that every year most videogames at least try get more realistic, most know that perfect realism will never happen but at least try. This forum is based of many hardcore sim base gamers who want to call an actual game of football. The NG Ncaa series makes me wonder if dev team really knows the x's and o's of football.

How can a game that is all physics base not have physics. I mean that could be a start.

Maybe actually test the game b4 u release it.

Maybe watch a college or nfl game to see how that plays.

Bingo we might have an real game of football. Its a game chess not checkers.

[JAYMO76]

[quote=Playmakers;2040628600]This is by far my favorite sports game from last year. I'll be playing it until NCAA 11 is released

It's very close in terms of gameplay and animations to NCAA 06 which was my favorite version even til this day.[/quote]


Yes it is by far the best next gen but I would never refer to it in the same category of 06... still the greatest football game ever!!!