First let me say I'm new here so please go easy on me
and if this thread was already posted before I am sorry, I have not seen it.
Now, the big issue I find in both games is what I like to call "assignment blocking". A component of a Offense thats almost obvious but not in the game? This is most prevelent during a run play rather than a pass. Let me give a example here to give you a better understanding.
"Real life," Play,24 Iso (out of I formation)-
During this play the HB would get the ball and run threw the 4 hole (between the RG and RT). Therfore the lineman will down block. RG would get the nose tackle (or double team a DT depending on defensive formation) and the RT would hit the End or LOLB, agian, depending on formation. The full back would hit the MLB and ISOlate him, hence 24 ISO. If everyone does there
assignment, the HB is guarenteed atleast 6-7 yards without having to make a move unless someone misses there block or gets beat.
Ncaa/Madden, play, 24 Iso (out of I formation)-
Agian half back gets the ball, but, RG goes for MLB, RT goes for DT (closing the hole for the RB to run threw), and the FB runs and hits a LB who is way out of the play anyway. HB gains x amount a yards (all based on chance or luck, maybe skill?)
I have a problem with this because why have offensive plays if noone actually has a assignment? You could argue and say pulling guards pull so therefore they are blocking correctly, but I believe that blockers are programed to run a certrain direction and to block whoever seems like a threat, or maybe not even a threat. It kills the running game! Also on a defensive perspective: a LB is suppose to read a guards first step. So if I took user control of a LB and tryed to read a guard I would be screwed. That takes a lot of realism away from the game. If I bored you im sorry, this is all IMO and will like to hear others thoughts. Thank you =)