Another thing I noticed about recruiting/prospects that needs to be fixed...

[georgiafan]

how many 4 and 5 * guys did u see added at the end of the year in the offseason?

[Mack Attack 11]

Quote: Originally Posted by ghettoqball

1 and 2 star players pretty much suck anyways, so there isn't even a point to recruiting them.

Ehhhhh. For us users that play 2 star teams these guys are better than walkons imo.

[Vaporub83]

Aren't the late additions supposed to represent the good guys that don't want to make a decision mid season. If so it makes sense not to have 3* guys. Since 3* aren't the best guys who could afford to wait.

[fcboiler87]

Quote: Originally Posted by Vaporub83

Aren't the late additions supposed to represent the good guys that don't want to make a decision mid season. If so it makes sense not to have 3* guys. Since 3* aren't the best guys who could afford to wait.

Yes. It's a poor attempt to represent guys who blew up their senior season. Instead of making someone who was a 2-star escalate, they just made new people. It was the most ridiculous thing they could ever come up with, but I guess it was easier to them than having a lower rated prospect progress. It is absolutely something that needs to be done away with because it is completely unrealistic.

[ghettoqball]

Okay, so if they only add 4 or 5 star prospects at the end of the year, then that really screws over the lower schools, since smaller schools have pretty much no chance at landing these guys. I guess you basically have to do all of your recruiting in season.

Ah well, I can live with this one. Hopefully it's adjusted next year though.

[Deegeezy]

I think it is more so to represent players who were not immediately considered college prospects who suddenly became good players during their senior year of high school.