NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

[cecondlife]

wow UCLA 2* that is nutz

[Noble Evildoer]

Quote: Originally Posted by TDenverFan

I would just like to know is the prestige based off of the past 10 years? All time history? Both, emphasizing on the past 10 years? Off Topic: Also, isn't Arkansas St the Red Wolves, not the Indians? I know this is off topic, but I thought they ditched the Indians name a wile ago.

Switched to Red Wolves in 2008 but had removed anything Indian related before that. As far as I could tell, OS doesn't have the block stAte logo or red wolf logo for their avatars, so I'm just using this.

As far as Tennessee, I feel like 4 and 5 stars is a weird spot where either one can be nationally prominent teams. The Vols falling to 4 stars doesn't seem that awful. Penn State staying at 6 for all eternity is very offensive.

And I suppose someone at EA is a huge USC fan or something. 2 stars for UCLA seems excessive. They're one star above teams like FIU, Tulane, Monroe, etc. That doesn't seem right.

[TDenverFan]

Quote: Originally Posted by Tovarich

Central Florida gets 3 stars yet again...Central Florida is MORE prestigous than UCLA. The homerism is amusing.

Over the past 5 years I would say they are, over all time, there is no way. I think they both should be 3*

[dan_457]

Quote: Originally Posted by Tovarich

Central Florida gets 3 stars yet again...Central Florida is MORE prestigous than UCLA. The homerism is amusing.

I don't have don't care about UCLA at all, but that's just ridiculous.

[br329]

Good God, home many of the developers are Penn St. grads?

[theharbinater]

Quote: Originally Posted by noplace

Bama should be a B+ at best on offense after the loses. Qb is a huge ? coming into the season..

That's fine. I got no prob with B+.

But there less questions around these qbs than there was gmacs first year. Except which one will win the starter spot. But both are (at least coming out is hs) rated better than gmac and among the best in the nation in their respective classes.

And again, bama doesn't and won't rely on a qb to win, especially when he's a first yr starter and they have an elite rb, a goof if not great oline and a defense loaded with talent and experience.

[volstopfan14]

The fact that Tennessee is a 4 star is not nearly as bad as the fact that UCLA is a 2 star. Penn State should be a 5 star too. If this is going on a scale of the past 5 years I can see Tennessee as a 4 star. If this is over a scale of 10-15 years there is no way Tennessee should be a 4 star.

[SeaOfRed75]

Quote: Originally Posted by br329

Good God, home many of the developers are Penn St. grads?

Exactly. That and Miami grads.

And will freaking EA give Bo and the Blackshirts credit and rate them a damn A some year please? A likely All-American at each level with other returning talent and a damn B+ again. Penn St and Miami's D better than Nebraska's?