Oregon's so jacked up!?!

[R0M0mentum09]

Here's another example from the same game.

http://youtu.be/KPyN2FcQCw4

[RColemanVT]

Considering the usage of reading the DT was to counter the defensive adjustments to make the DE a tougher read, there is no way it will be in the game as it is currently. The defense in game doesn't have the capacity to make those kinds of adjustments mid-game/season and as it is most spread teams still read the DE. There is a difference between constructive criticism and just being way too picky

[PaperBoyx703]

Quote: Originally Posted by R0M0mentum09

To some degree it is, it's just pure laziness on EA's part. Oregon made the Rose bowl then followed up with a National Championship appearance. . . there's no reason for it not to be implemented all ready.

Here's an Idea, Go get a job at EA and fix it yourself.

Blocking logic is the same for all teams until they cater to all the teams blocking schemes then this pointless thread is well...pointless.

Just because of Oregon's recent achievement, and I do mean "recent", doesn't merit some special attention where only Oregon's blocking scheme logic and no one else. Just so you know there are more special blocking schemes out in the NCAA other than that 3-Tech stuff and etc Oregon runs.

[R0M0mentum09]

Quote: Originally Posted by RColemanVT

Considering the usage of reading the DT was to counter the defensive adjustments to make the DE a tougher read, there is no way it will be in the game as it is currently. The defense in game doesn't have the capacity to make those kinds of adjustments mid-game/season and as it is most spread teams still read the DE. There is a difference between constructive criticism and just being way too picky

I'm not being picky? I'm being patient, I've waited 3 full years for this to be implemented.

[Card-me]

Quote: Originally Posted by R0M0mentum09

I'm not being picky? I'm being patient, I've waited 3 full years for this to be implemented.

Three whole years?

[RColemanVT]

Quote: Originally Posted by R0M0mentum09

I'm not being picky? I'm being patient, I've waited 3 full years for this to be implemented.

No, you are being picky. This is a pointless complaint, it barely affects how the spread option is run if at all and there are much more important aspects of football to be added before this thing that maybe a small handful of teams run.

I would rather see zone blocking schemes, proper flexbone OL alignments, defensive assignments(#1 CB on #1 WR, etc.), and numerous other things before something this trivial

[acts238shaun]

Reading DT = midline opt. I'm just glad that is in the game.

[drewst18]

I think R0M0 is a little bit of a kook... man its a game.