More Links

PaperBoyx703 · 07-14-2011, 02:23 PM

In RTG I received a SPARQ rating of 97.00 at the end of the year. Signed with Michigan and had a speed of 80, and my tendency of HB was speed along with CB position tendency (coverage).

illwill10 · 07-14-2011, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by l_XaVo7o3_l


	In RTG I received a SPARQ rating of 97.00 at the end of the year. Signed with Michigan and had a speed of 80, and my tendency of HB was speed along with CB position tendency (coverage).

I had a 110.00 as a Balanced HB with 85 speed

PaperBoyx703 · 07-14-2011, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by illwill10


	I had a 110.00 as a Balanced HB with 85 speed

I think it's busted because there is no way... Lol

smithc6 · 07-14-2011, 02:32 PM

The SPARQ 100 is still used as the top 100 (even though Im not sure its supposed to be). I made a complaint earlier about this, and if you look at the all players list, the SPARQ 100 are the top on that list. The fact that the game biases RBs, WRs and ATHs as 5* recruits is a huge oversight IMO and needs to be fixed. Every time ive restarted recruiting (which is going on 20 times now) its the same with very few of the other positions. Every once in a while youll see a QB, DE, DT, CB, or MLB. Not once have I seen a 5* OL or FS/SS. I know its probably not super high on their list, but EA needs to fix this.

illwill10 · 07-14-2011, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by l_XaVo7o3_l


	I think it's busted because there is no way... Lol

Well since I was a 5* balanced I didnt have high ratings but I had alot of ratings including strength all over 77+

PaperBoyx703 · 07-14-2011, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by illwill10


	Well since I was a 5 balanced I didnt have high ratings but I had alot of ratings including strength all over 77+*

I was 5* RB and 3* CB and the #1 prospect in the nation. With all speed tendencies, there's no way I should be an 80 speed. I was ranked like 80 ovr once I began, I think RTG keeps randomizing things even after I selected something else like my team name went from Majors to Botls to Buckeyes...Buckeyes of all the names to give a Michigan man, I was sick to my stomach lol.

So maybe it changed my player type. In other words it needs to be fixed.

I seriously think RTG along with many other features added or changed this year are broken.

Brandwin · 07-14-2011, 02:49 PM

I'm lost. What's the point of SPARQ in NCAA?

07-14-2011, 02:23 PM	#17
PaperBoyx703 MVP OVR: 22 Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,596 Blog Entries: 1	Re: SPARQ 100 In RTG I received a SPARQ rating of 97.00 at the end of the year. Signed with Michigan and had a speed of 80, and my tendency of HB was speed along with CB position tendency (coverage).

07-14-2011, 02:32 PM	#20
smithc6 Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Feb 2006	Re: SPARQ 100 The SPARQ 100 is still used as the top 100 (even though Im not sure its supposed to be). I made a complaint earlier about this, and if you look at the all players list, the SPARQ 100 are the top on that list. The fact that the game biases RBs, WRs and ATHs as 5* recruits is a huge oversight IMO and needs to be fixed. Every time ive restarted recruiting (which is going on 20 times now) its the same with very few of the other positions. Every once in a while youll see a QB, DE, DT, CB, or MLB. Not once have I seen a 5* OL or FS/SS. I know its probably not super high on their list, but EA needs to fix this. btemp likes this.

07-14-2011, 02:49 PM	#23
Brandwin Hall Of Fame OVR: 50 Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 30,643	Re: SPARQ 100 I'm lost. What's the point of SPARQ in NCAA?

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?