Don't even notice that type of thing regarding your 1st comment. Does this, or if it's the reverse at other positions, really matter? Don't mean for that to come off as critical of you, either. It's not, nor is it my place to criticize
anyone's opinion
. I simply haven't looked at that situation.
GREAT idea with your 2nd comment. Happens with maybe even 25% of my recruiting board 'annually.' Maybe add 1 more step into the "add to my recruiting board" process allowing you to scroll through positions to label him as for your intentions. Might help add a layer of clarity with one problem I've seen posted in other threads -- maybe a SS with Early Playing Time high on his ratings grading you low b/c of your two returning SSs, but you plan on moving him to OLB where he'd get that Early PT. I think for this to work, though, they'd (EA) have to implement more coding for the recruit to 'see' that w/ his OVR the chances of him getting early PT are high (think: the Early PT WR recruit who downgrades you in that area b/c you have 5 returners, but all or most are of lower OVR so if he committed, he'd actually stroll right into a starting role).
Would like to see your idea here get some play from returning post-ers.