NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

[TheLeviticalLawKid3]

Quote: Originally Posted by blkrptnt819

Auburn, Clemson, The U, ND, Boise have NO business being ranked a 6* Neither does Oregon but different argument for a different day.

Auburn has won a national championship in the past two years. Believe it or not, we are a premier program in college football. If you have won the national title in the past few seasons, you should be a high caliber team.

Prestige has nothing to do with team ratings. If I'm not mistaken, prestige automatically goes to 6 stars if you win the national title.

[JHusker13]

The Texas 99 OVR rating is a typo, right?

[TheLeviticalLawKid3]

Quote: Originally Posted by JHusker13

The Texas 99 OVR rating is a typo, right?

I was expecting 89.

[GoSpartans11]

If you look at the demo ratings, they match up if you assume the chart is OVR-Offense-Defense. USC in demo is A+/A+/B+. Chart goes 99/99/91. Oregon in the demo is A+/A/A-. Chart says 99/94/95. I think some of the ratings are mixed up possibly, unless dynasty progression changed Oregon's offense and defense by a few points in either direction? Because LSU and Bama match up perfectly with the chart...

[themassacre771.1]

Clemson 6?

[cparrish]

Who is Colarado? Never heard of them before. As for Colorado, 82 overall? Nah, I'd say we are maybe a 79ish at best. Team is way too young and unproven and still picking up the pieces after the worst football coach ever in Dan Hawkins.

[AttackAttack]

Clemson's D should be an 75.

South Carolina had the number 4 D in the country last year. Should be 95

[CcAaRrSsOoNn3]

At least Virginia Tech's special teams are a 99!!!!