ncaa 2013 player ratings?

[TheBadOwl]

John Simon and Jonathan Hankins should be rated higher for OSU. Hankins is projected to be a top-10 pick. Other than that, I think it's fair.

[llinear]

Quote: Originally Posted by Ky3217

Really? They probably screwed it up for the third year straight and made him a crappy linebacker. You'd think they'd learn by now. The guy's the best defensive end, if not defensive lineman, in the B1G

Not sure if this is a pattern but Bruce Irvin was not even in the game last year.

[blkrptnt819]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheBadOwl

John Simon and Jonathan Hankins should be rated higher for OSU. Hankins is projected to be a top-10 pick. Other than that, I think it's fair.

I agree. I didn't expect them to be that low either. Hank is a good run stopper and John Simon is incredible. I also expected to see Williams but maybe he's not included.

[blkrptnt819]

Quote: Originally Posted by aerovt

I think he was talking about how I had accidentally mistaken a previous screen as Wisconsin players

And the screen I quoted is actually Wisky.

[1GATOR FAN]

Quote: Originally Posted by brutx15

Here is the top of Ohio State... According to the team ratings, the Buckeyes are a 95 overall, 89 offense, 95 defense. So their ratings must be different this year somehow, because I'm not seeing how we can be a 95 overall with these player ratings... USC:

I agree on OSU only 2 players that barley reach even just a flat 90 rating and they both play on a different side of the ball.... But they get a 95 overall yet not a single player reaches that rating

Like I've said it has more to do with who the team is than anything else.