NCAA 14 - Prestige Ratings

[bad_philanthropy]

Stanford at 6 is surprising, and I'm kind of shocked UCLA isn't at least 4. I know they had been in the crapper for a while, but the combination of off-field assets and last year's upswing should be worth a bit more. Also, they have gone to consecutive conference championship games*.

[RebelHog]

Quote: Originally Posted by bad_philanthropy

Stanford at 6 is surprising, and I'm kind of shocked UCLA isn't at least 4. I know they had been in the crapper for a while, but the combination of off-field assets and last year's upswing should be worth a bit more. Also, they have gone to consecutive conference championship games*.

UCLA is on cusp of **** but until they reach a BCS or make a high tier bowl they are right where they belong

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

[nbcards]

NIU still a 2 unfortunately even after a BCS Bowl

[GeneralMike]

Quote: Originally Posted by TDenverFan

As a Duke fan, I'd like to know the rationale behind us being a 2 while Wazzou is a 1. Duke kinda sucks at football

I agree that WSU should be a 2*, but they haven't gone to a bowl since 2003.

TCU as a 5* seemed a bit high to me.

[Westlake_88]

ULL has won back-to-back New Orleans Bowls and is still a 1*? C'mon man...

[TDenverFan]

Quote: Originally Posted by GeneralMike

I agree that WSU should be a 2*, but they haven't gone to a bowl since 2003. TCU as a 5* seemed a bit high to me.

Duke hasn't had a winning season since '93.

[citylimit10]

Didn't see Kansas State listed. Am I just overlooking them?

[goblue1523]

Quote: Originally Posted by nbcards

NIU still a 2 unfortunately even after a BCS Bowl

And 3 straight 10+ win seasons and back to back MAC championships.