Funny, informative NCAA 14 Review!!

[EvanRG]

Strange, I love the new recruiting system.

Let's be real here for a moment -- in real-life recruiting, Georgia isn't always going to be told why a 17-,18-year-old kid picked Auburn over them. Sometimes it just doesn't have anything to do with weight rooms or prestige. In fact, their decision could be based on an experience a friend had etc...

The point system represents how much effort, time and attention is placed on a player. Instead of spending an hour making rather stupid phone call exchanges, you simply say, "We think you are going to be talented, so we are investing X amount of resources in obtaining you."

The review also didn't touch on the depth of the college visits and how combo visits can impact a recruits decision.

I thought the review was clever and accurate in some regard, but I couldn't disagree more about the recruiting. It has cut the tediousness of NCAA 14 down to a minimum and allowed me to play the game.

[coogrfan]

Quote:

That’s the high water mark for me. Not the actual year, but the NCAA 2005 game

Excuse me? The game with the laughably bad (beach)ball physics and wr's who couldn't catch the damn ball was his high water mark?

Entertaining review, but the author has no clue imo.

[coach02]

that was some funny s*#t!!! very honest and entertaining. I have been waiting for Carson's rosters to start a dynasty, but i really want to "experience" the game, so I'll be diving in tonight.

[SteboSSK]

RTG is so bland and dry. No clue why people still play it annually.