More Links

shishka55 · 07-12-2004, 06:05 PM

Is he in the game? I know people hate these questions and I could just wait 'til I get my copy tomorrow but I just wanted to know what they were going to do with the fast he hasn't been officially reinstated yet.

Sully · 07-12-2004, 06:06 PM

Quote:

shishka55 said:
Is he in the game? I know people hate these questions and I could just wait 'til I get my copy tomorrow but I just wanted to know what they were going to do with the fast he hasn't been officially reinstated yet.

Yes, he is in the game.

Brandwin · 07-12-2004, 06:08 PM

Well since its not really "him" but it is, you know. They could add his likeness with no problems, rather he plays this year or not. I dont think he is starting though and is 4th on their depth chart I believe.

Jistic · 07-12-2004, 06:21 PM

Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally.

ochoco · 07-12-2004, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Jistic said:
Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally.

I agree, plus this is totally different than the Clarret situation. Mike deserves to play IMHO. Whereas Clarret deserves a brand new shiney BINKEY.

brahmagoul · 07-12-2004, 07:02 PM

Well remember that Clarett was still likely to play when this game was released last year. He was practicing with the team for the Washington game and wasn't pronounced "done" until the season was up and running.

Also, could someone tell me if Kent State quarterback Josh Cribbs is in the game? He would be QB No. 9. Otherwise, I'd expect the starter to be No. 2.

Badgun · 07-12-2004, 07:14 PM

Quote:

ochoco said:

Quote:

Jistic said:
Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally.

I agree, plus this is totally different than the Clarret situation. Mike deserves to play IMHO. Whereas Clarret deserves a brand new shiney BINKEY.

He does not deserve to play. There was always doubt that the lower court judge's decision would stand. Williams and his advisors knew this. He may not be as big of a punk as Clarett, but he still saw dollar signs and they apparently were more important than his education and eligibility. Being greedy and ignorant is no excuse here. Hell, I'm not a player, coach, or official, but I had enough sense to know that those guys were not going to be allowed in the draft.

Oh, they'll probably let him play, but he does not DESERVE anything. What he deserves is to lose that $60,000 scholarship that he so quickly turned his back on when he though he was going to get to go pro.

At some point these guys are going to have to stop worrying about teh bling bling and play ball.

stabmasterb · 07-12-2004, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Jistic said:
Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally.

don't be so sure about that. he has to document and repay every penny his agent hooked him up with. williams himself said over $100,000. not very easy to do when you haven't worked all summer. lol. in my opinion the nfl needs to hook him up with a suplemental draft.

07-12-2004, 06:05 PM	#1
shishka55 Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Oct 2003	Mike Williams, USC Is he in the game? I know people hate these questions and I could just wait 'til I get my copy tomorrow but I just wanted to know what they were going to do with the fast he hasn't been officially reinstated yet.

07-12-2004, 06:06 PM	#2
Sully Hall Of Fame OVR: 34 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Middletown, DE Posts: 16,002	Re: Mike Williams, USC Quote: *shishka55 said:* Is he in the game? I know people hate these questions and I could just wait 'til I get my copy tomorrow but I just wanted to know what they were going to do with the fast he hasn't been officially reinstated yet. Yes, he is in the game.

07-12-2004, 06:08 PM	#3
Brandwin Hall Of Fame OVR: 50 Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 30,643	Re: Mike Williams, USC Well since its not really "him" but it is, you know. They could add his likeness with no problems, rather he plays this year or not. I dont think he is starting though and is 4th on their depth chart I believe.

07-12-2004, 06:21 PM	#4
Jistic Hall Of Fame OVR: 28 Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Chicago, ILL Posts: 16,404	Re: Mike Williams, USC Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally.

07-12-2004, 06:28 PM	#5
ochoco Pac12fan OVR: 12 Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Molalla, OR Posts: 2,179	Re: Mike Williams, USC Quote: *Jistic said:* Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally. I agree, plus this is totally different than the Clarret situation. Mike deserves to play IMHO. Whereas Clarret deserves a brand new shiney BINKEY.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

07-12-2004, 07:02 PM	#6
brahmagoul MVP OVR: 12 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cleveland, OH	Re: Mike Williams, USC Well remember that Clarett was still likely to play when this game was released last year. He was practicing with the team for the Washington game and wasn't pronounced "done" until the season was up and running. Also, could someone tell me if Kent State quarterback Josh Cribbs is in the game? He would be QB No. 9. Otherwise, I'd expect the starter to be No. 2.

07-12-2004, 07:14 PM	#7
Badgun MVP OVR: 12 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Virginia	Re: Mike Williams, USC Quote: *ochoco said:* Quote: *Jistic said:* Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally. I agree, plus this is totally different than the Clarret situation. Mike deserves to play IMHO. Whereas Clarret deserves a brand new shiney BINKEY. He does not deserve to play. There was always doubt that the lower court judge's decision would stand. Williams and his advisors knew this. He may not be as big of a punk as Clarett, but he still saw dollar signs and they apparently were more important than his education and eligibility. Being greedy and ignorant is no excuse here. Hell, I'm not a player, coach, or official, but I had enough sense to know that those guys were not going to be allowed in the draft. Oh, they'll probably let him play, but he does not DESERVE anything. What he deserves is to lose that $60,000 scholarship that he so quickly turned his back on when he though he was going to get to go pro. At some point these guys are going to have to stop worrying about teh bling bling and play ball.

07-12-2004, 07:39 PM	#8
stabmasterb Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Mar 2003	Re: Mike Williams, USC Quote: *Jistic said:* Now, what to do with him. I have feeling he will be playing this year so I'm just gonna name him normally. don't be so sure about that. he has to document and repay every penny his agent hooked him up with. williams himself said over $100,000. not very easy to do when you haven't worked all summer. lol. in my opinion the nfl needs to hook him up with a suplemental draft.

More Links

Mike Williams, USC