Has anyone noticed that the guy rated right behind Hurst (from Vanderbilt, but has a generic name that's always different, usually picked between 10 and 20) is actually better than him? I use the Field General philosophy, and he has a 98 potential compared to Hurst's 97. When fully developed, he has 98 throw power, 99 throw accuracy, 99 awareness, and has speed/agi/accel in the mid 70's.
Hurst fully developed has 95 throw power, 99 throw accuracy, 98 awareness, and speed/agi/accel in the low 60's.
The only advantage Hurst has on this guy is his learning and durability, which aren't that much better. Anybody drafted this dude before?
Hurst fully developed has 95 throw power, 99 throw accuracy, 98 awareness, and speed/agi/accel in the low 60's.
The only advantage Hurst has on this guy is his learning and durability, which aren't that much better. Anybody drafted this dude before?
Comment