Maybe this will just all work out, but it's confusing right now.
I'm approaching my 6th game having already had my bye week. Players are coming to me asking to renegotiate. So far it's been the bottom of the depth chart, I would prefer to start at the top and work down but I don't seem to be able to initiate negotiations.
I have huge cap space for 2008 ($15M) so I would think that any deal that doesn't involve a bonus is OK. Player will be happy, I'll have the choice later of cutting him w/o impacting 2009 cap space.
Is that right?
I read ebongreen's article about what's required to sign stars and starters and I think I can deal with that when the time comes.
I just don't want to sign a bunch of backups first if there is some cap problem down the road. If there's not a cap issue, my backups are a bit more valuable to me if they never test free agency (play knowledge). I'm guessing that if I just refuse to deal with these guys now, they won't come back until they are on the FA market and have forgotten my plays. So I would like to give contracts for say, 10% more than the going rate, but be able to get out with no cap hit if they don't make the team.
I think real teams use roster bonuses to deal with that problem.
Some of these demands are just silly! For example, I have a 73 OVL OLB that I signed during preseason for $600K. I did think he was better for my money than the other $600K OLBs. He's asking $7M over 3 years and I'm not even allowed to offer him less than about $5.5 for 3 years. I think his appropriate price for my team is about $2.2M for 3 years.
So, what are the pitfalls here? Do I have to guess correctly now who can make the 2009 team or start training backups again every year from scratch?