NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

[Keirik]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Alright, alright, I'm done. As usual, it boils down to my opinion versus your opinion. But I'm allowed to express mine just as you are allowed to express yours.



Okay, that's just ridiculous.

actually, what's ridiculous is that you're the only person who confuses fact with opinion. As i said, great that YOU don't find it out of proportion. Others including myself do. I don't find your opinion ridiculous. I'm actually envious. I wish i could turn a blind eye to moronic decisions like fog, seeing the breath, cinamotion, crab goalies, pucks almost as large as the blade, et al, and still be a 2k fanboy.

[JimmyDeicide]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Come on all he slick is trying to say is its the size of the other games im sure, which is a little bigger than actual size which has been fine any other year.

[Scottdau]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Have you see the puck in EA's game that puck is huge too, mostly because it has a shadow under it that you can't turn off. So I think the point is mute.

[JimmyDeicide]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Its huge but as hes saying it doesnt really take away from anything its not like its a puck from NHL 95 now is it?

[tabulaRasa]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Turn off the puck shadow, and problem solved.

BTW, awesome proportions, and nice nice upgrade in GFX.

[savoie2006]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Turn off the puck shadow, and problem solved.

BTW, awesome proportions, and nice nice upgrade in GFX.

Turn off the puck shadow, and problem solved.

[Scottdau]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

It looks like the shadow is off. On the Ea's game you can only make it smaller, but not off. So the problem is not solved.

[savoie2006]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Honestly, with the whole puck debate, did anyone take into consideration the zoom level on the game? I mean it's entirely possible they zoomed in before they snapped the pic.

[Scottdau]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Honestly, with the whole puck debate, did anyone take into consideration the zoom level on the game? I mean it's entirely possible they zoomed in before they snapped the pic.

I think they made the puck bigger to show off their new feature. Actual rubber pucks. It will bounce of the ice.

[baa7]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Honestly, with the whole puck debate

There's no debate. Someone commented on the game, and someone else didn't appreciate their POV and made it personal. Typical OS conversation, lol.

[baa7]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Turn off the puck shadow, and problem solved.

I honestly would like to hear how you made that jump in logic. The puck looks too big and there's no puck shadow, yet you're saying turning off the puck shadow that doesn't exist will somehow shrink the size of the puck?

[baa7]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

And you as well. Let's just turn off the puck shadow that... isn't there in the first place? How does that work exactly?

[Keirik]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

Honestly, with the whole puck debate, did anyone take into consideration the zoom level on the game? I mean it's entirely possible they zoomed in before they snapped the pic.

how would the zoom make the puck big without anything else?

[daflyboys]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

It's all good guys..... sometimes I look at, er, things, and think they're bigger than they really are.

[savoie2006]

Re: NHL 2K10 Hi Res Screenshot (Lecavalier)

how would the zoom make the puck big without anything else?

Because to me the camera looks zoomed in on the players. In other words it doesn't look like a normal camera veiw. So being closer obviously things are going to appear bigger, right?